Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPeura, Maiju
dc.contributor.authorTriviño, María
dc.contributor.authorMazziotta, Adriano
dc.contributor.authorPodkopaev, Dmitry
dc.contributor.authorJuutinen, Artti
dc.contributor.authorMönkkönen, Mikko
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-02T06:36:58Z
dc.date.available2016-11-02T06:36:58Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationPeura, M., Triviño, M., Mazziotta, A., Podkopaev, D., Juutinen, A., & Mönkkönen, M. (2016). Managing boreal forests for the simultaneous production of collectable goods and timber revenues. <i>Silva Fennica</i>, <i>50</i>(5), Article 1672. <a href="https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.1672" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.1672</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_26292618
dc.identifier.otherTUTKAID_71600
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/51790
dc.description.abstractTimber Production is an economically important provisioning ecosystem service in forests, but is often in conflict with the provision of other ecosystem services. In multifunctional forestry, the production of timber and non-timber ecosystem services should coexist in the same landscape. To this end, we explored the capacity of a boreal landscape to simultaneously produce collectable goods − bilberry (Vaccimium myrtillus L.), cowberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.) and cep (Boletus edulis Bull.) − alongside timber revenues. We also identified optimal forest management plans to achieve this. Furthermore, we analyzed trade-offs between collectable good yields and timber production, as well as between their economic values. We ran forest growth simulations under seven alternative management regimes at a landscape level across 50-year planning horizons. Then, we used multi-objective optimization to explore trade-offs and identify optimal forest management plans. The results showed that the strongest trade-off was between bilberry and timber production, resulting in a large loss in timber revenues for a gain in bilberry production. However, the conflicts between other collectables and timber production were relatively small: It was possible to increase the provision of collectable goods 4–15% with small reductions (3−5%) from timber revenues. With careful forest planning, there is the potential to simultaneously produce high levels of collectable goods and timber revenues in the landscape.en
dc.languagefin
dc.language.isofin
dc.publisherSuomen Metsätieteellinen Seura; Luonnonvarakeskus LUKE
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSilva Fennica
dc.subject.othermultifunctional forestry
dc.subject.othertimber
dc.subject.othermushroom
dc.subject.otherwildberry
dc.subject.othernontimber forest product
dc.subject.othertrade-offs
dc.subject.otheroptimal forest managements
dc.subject.otherecosystem services
dc.subject.otherecosystems
dc.subject.otheroptimization
dc.titleManaging boreal forests for the simultaneous production of collectable goods and timber revenues
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-201611014539
dc.contributor.laitosBio- ja ympäristötieteiden laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosDepartment of Biological and Environmental Scienceen
dc.contributor.oppiaineEkologia ja evoluutiobiologiafi
dc.contributor.oppiaineEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.date.updated2016-11-01T10:15:04Z
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.relation.issn0037-5330
dc.relation.numberinseries5
dc.relation.volume50
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© the Authors & Finnish Society of Forest Science & Natural Resources Institute Finland, 2016.
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.relation.grantnumber275329
dc.subject.ysopuuntuotanto
dc.subject.ysomarjanpoiminta
dc.subject.ysoekosysteemipalvelut
dc.subject.ysometsät
dc.subject.ysometsätalous
dc.subject.ysometsänkasvatus
dc.subject.ysometsänhoito
dc.subject.ysomonikäyttö
dc.subject.ysometsätulot
dc.subject.ysooptimointi
dc.subject.ysosienestys
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p6115
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2898
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p24628
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5454
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1861
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p24915
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7534
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p11970
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p10327
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p13477
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2900
dc.relation.doi10.14214/sf.1672
dc.relation.funderSuomen Akatemiafi
dc.relation.funderResearch Council of Finlanden
jyx.fundingprogramAkatemiahanke, SAfi
jyx.fundingprogramAcademy Project, AoFen
jyx.fundinginformationWe are grateful to the Academy of Finland (project 275329 to M.M.), Kone foundation (project 46-10588 to M.M.) and Jenny and Antti Wihuri foundation (to M.P.) for funding. Data was compiled and processed with funding from the Finnish Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry 377 (project 311159).
dc.type.okmA1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record