dc.contributor.author | Saariluoma, Pertti | |
dc.contributor.author | Rauterberg, Matthias | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-09-26T04:36:21Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-09-26T04:36:21Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Saariluoma, P., & Rauterberg, M. (2016). Turing's Error-revised. <i>International Journal of Philosophy Study</i>, <i>4</i>, 22-41. <a href="https://doi.org/10.14355/ijps.2016.04.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.14355/ijps.2016.04.004</a> | |
dc.identifier.other | CONVID_26227100 | |
dc.identifier.other | TUTKAID_71243 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/51453 | |
dc.description.abstract | Many important lines of argumentation have been presented during the last decades claiming that machines cannot think like
people. Yet, it has been possible to construct devices and information systems, which replace people in tasks which have
previously been occupied by people as the tasks require intelligence. The long and versatile discourse over, what machine
intelligence is, suggests that there is something unclear in the foundations of the discourse itself. Therefore, we critically studied
the foundations of used theory languages. By looking critically some of the main arguments of machine thinking, one can find
unifying factors. Most of them are based on the fact that computers cannot perform sense-making selections without human
support and supervision. This calls attention to mathematics and computation itself as a representational constructing language
and as a theory language in analysing human mentality. It is possible to notice that selections must be based on relevance, i.e., on
why some elements of sets belong to one class and others do not. Since there is no mathematical justification to such selection, it
is possible to say that relevance and related concepts are beyond the power of expression of mathematics and computation.
Consequently, Turing erroneously assumed that mathematics and formal language is equivalent with natural languages. He
missed the fact that mathematics cannot express relevance, and for this reason, mathematical representations cannot be
complete models of the human mind. | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Science and Engineering Publishing Company | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | International Journal of Philosophy Study | |
dc.subject.other | computation | |
dc.subject.other | consciousness | |
dc.subject.other | formal language | |
dc.subject.other | mind | |
dc.subject.other | model | |
dc.subject.other | Turing machine | |
dc.title | Turing's Error-revised | |
dc.type | article | |
dc.identifier.urn | URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201609224180 | |
dc.contributor.laitos | Tietojenkäsittelytieteiden laitos | fi |
dc.contributor.laitos | Department of Computer Science and Information Systems | en |
dc.contributor.oppiaine | Kognitiotiede | fi |
dc.contributor.oppiaine | Cognitive Science | en |
dc.type.uri | http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle | |
dc.date.updated | 2016-09-22T06:15:03Z | |
dc.type.coar | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 | |
dc.description.reviewstatus | peerReviewed | |
dc.format.pagerange | 22-41 | |
dc.relation.issn | 2328-1707 | |
dc.relation.numberinseries | 0 | |
dc.relation.volume | 4 | |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | |
dc.rights.copyright | © the Authors, 2016. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons License. | |
dc.rights.accesslevel | openAccess | fi |
dc.rights.url | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ | |
dc.relation.doi | 10.14355/ijps.2016.04.004 | |
dc.type.okm | A1 | |