Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLeppäaho, Tanja
dc.contributor.authorPlakoyiannaki, Emmanuella
dc.contributor.authorDimitratos, Pavlos
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-03T07:29:10Z
dc.date.available2015-12-03T07:29:10Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationLeppäaho, T., Plakoyiannaki, E., & Dimitratos, P. (2015). The Case Study in Family Business : An Analysis of Current Research Practices and Recommendations. <em>Family Business Review</em>, 29 (2), 159-173. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0894486515614157">doi:10.1177/0894486515614157</a>
dc.identifier.otherTUTKAID_67492
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/47969
dc.description.abstractIn this study we identified and analyzed 75 articles in the family business (FB) literature between 2000 and 2014, focusing on the case study design they adopted. We found the positivistic case study approach to be the FB disciplinary convention. The two alternative approaches of critical realism and interpretivism were used to a significantly lesser extent. We anticipate that in the future the positivistic approach will continue to be used widely. The other two approaches could be employed to a greater extent, thus contributing to scientific pluralism in FB case study research.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSage Publications, Inc.; Family Firm Institute
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFamily Business Review
dc.subject.othercase study
dc.subject.otherfamily business
dc.subject.otherphilosophy of science
dc.subject.otherqualitative positivism
dc.subject.othercritical realism
dc.subject.otherinterpretivism
dc.titleThe Case Study in Family Business : An Analysis of Current Research Practices and Recommendations
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-201510213438
dc.contributor.laitosKauppakorkeakoulufi
dc.contributor.laitosSchool of Business and Economicsen
dc.contributor.oppiaineBasic or discovery scholarship
dc.contributor.oppiaineYrittäjyys
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/SubmittedJournalArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0894486515614157
dc.date.updated2015-10-21T12:15:13Z
dc.type.coarjournal article
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.format.pagerange159-173
dc.relation.issn0894-4865
dc.relation.volume29
dc.type.versionacceptedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© The Author(s) 2015. This is a final draft version of an article whose final and definitive form has been published by Sage Publications, Inc. Published in this repository with the kind permission of the publisher.
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record