Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

dc.contributor.authorKangas, Annika
dc.contributor.authorHartikainen, Markus
dc.contributor.authorMiettinen, Kaisa
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-10T09:24:05Z
dc.date.available2015-08-10T09:24:05Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationKangas, A., Hartikainen, M., & Miettinen, K. (2015). Simultaneous optimization of harvest schedule and data quality. <i>Canadian Journal of Forest Research</i>, <i>45</i>(8), 1034-1044. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2014-0443" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2014-0443</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_24808639
dc.identifier.otherTUTKAID_66693
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/46583
dc.description.abstractIn many recent studies, the value of forest inventory information in harvest scheduling has been examined. In a previous paper, we demonstrated that making measurement decisions for stands for which the harvest decision is uncertain simultaneously with the harvest decisions may be highly profitable. In that study, the quality of additional measurements was not a decision variable, and the only options were between making no measurements or measuring perfect information. In this study, we introduce data quality into the decision problem, i.e., the decisionmaker can select between making imperfect or perfect measurements. The imperfect information is obtained with a specific scenario tree formulation. Our decision problem includes three types of decisions: harvest decisions, measurement decisions, and decisions about measurement quality. In addition, the timing of the harvests and measurements must be decided. These decisions are evaluated based on two objectives: discounted aggregate income for the planning periods and the end value of the forest at the end of the planning horizon. Solving the bi-objective optimization problem formed using the ε-constraint method showed that imperfect information was mostly sufficient for the harvest timing decisions during the planning horizon but perfect information was required to meet the end-value constraint. The relative importance of the two objectives affects the measurements indirectly by increasing or decreasing the number of certain decisions (i.e., situations in which the optimal decision is identical in all scenarios).
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherNRC Research Press; National Research Council Canada (NRC)
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCanadian Journal of Forest Research
dc.subject.otherinformation economics
dc.subject.otherdata quality
dc.subject.otherforest inventory
dc.subject.otherstochastic optpmization
dc.subject.otherconstraints
dc.subject.otherbi-objective optimization
dc.subject.otherPareto optimality
dc.subject.othermulti-objective optimization
dc.titleSimultaneous optimization of harvest schedule and data quality
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-201508052618
dc.contributor.laitosTietotekniikan laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosDepartment of Mathematical Information Technologyen
dc.contributor.oppiaineTietotekniikkafi
dc.contributor.oppiaineMathematical Information Technologyen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.date.updated2015-08-05T09:15:08Z
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.format.pagerange1034-1044
dc.relation.issn0045-5067
dc.relation.numberinseries8
dc.relation.volume45
dc.type.versionacceptedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2015 NRC Research Press. This is a final draft version of an article whose final and definitive form has been published by National Research Council Canada. Published in this repository with the kind permission of the publisher.
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.subject.ysopäätöksenteko
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p8743
dc.relation.doi10.1139/cjfr-2014-0443
dc.type.okmA1


Aineistoon kuuluvat tiedostot

Thumbnail

Aineisto kuuluu seuraaviin kokoelmiin

Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot