Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

dc.contributor.authorSilvennoinen, Minna
dc.contributor.authorAntikainen, Teuvo
dc.contributor.authorMecklin, Jukka-Pekka
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-30T06:15:45Z
dc.date.available2015-12-20T22:45:05Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationSilvennoinen, M., Antikainen, T., & Mecklin, J.-P. (2015). Video-assisted surgery : suggestions for failure prevention in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. <i>Cognition, Technology and Work</i>, <i>17</i>(1), 145-155. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-014-0317-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-014-0317-8</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_24416466
dc.identifier.otherTUTKAID_64445
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/45193
dc.description.abstractBackground: Surgery differs from other medical specialties in its execution. It is often complex and includes considerable individual variations. Observing problems in operating theatres (OT) allows for the identification of system failures which should be defined for learning purposes to increase patient safety and enhance general safety culture within hospital organizations. This study evaluates a common video-assisted surgical procedure, laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) through failure analysis. The profile of the LC procedure and failure sources is presented. Methods: Data consisted video-observations and interviews concerning twelve LC operations performed at a day surgery unit. All operations were teaching sessions. Qualitative analysis was undertaken. Through task analysis, specialist interviews and failure identification a failure profile of LC was produced. Results: Twenty failure types were identified, failures were for example: remote attention towards ergonomics; novice’s skill failures; inadequate supervision and unnecessary risk taking caused by tight operating schedules. The results showed that the importance of working principles should be emphasized. The failure profile of LC revealed three phases featuring multiple failures: dissecting the peritoneal covering; identifying, sealing and cutting the cystic duct and cystic artery; detaching the gallbladder from the hepatic bed and inspecting the hepatic bed. Conclusions: This study offers information for hospital organizations about the current state of surgical work and surgical skills learning. This information could be exploited in the development of system defences: error prevention mechanisms through investing in the redesign of work tasks and working methods; as well as reinforcing education and training for enhancing patient safety in OT.fi
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer UK
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCognition, Technology and Work
dc.subject.otherfailure analysis
dc.subject.otherlaparoscopic cholecystectomy
dc.subject.othersurgical work
dc.subject.othersystem failures
dc.subject.othervideo observation
dc.titleVideo-assisted surgery : suggestions for failure prevention in laparoscopic cholecystectomy
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-201501291212
dc.contributor.laitosAgora Centerfi
dc.contributor.laitosTietojenkäsittelytieteiden laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosAgora Centeren
dc.contributor.laitosDepartment of Computer Science and Information Systemsen
dc.contributor.oppiaineKognitiotiedefi
dc.contributor.oppiaineCognitive Scienceen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.date.updated2015-01-29T16:30:02Z
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.format.pagerange145-155
dc.relation.issn1435-5558
dc.relation.numberinseries1
dc.relation.volume17
dc.type.versionacceptedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© Springer-Verlag London 2014. This is a Final Draft version of an article whose final and definitive version has been published by Springer.
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.subject.ysoinhimilliset tekijät
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p27453
dc.relation.doi10.1007/s10111-014-0317-8
dc.type.okmA1


Aineistoon kuuluvat tiedostot

Thumbnail

Aineisto kuuluu seuraaviin kokoelmiin

Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot