Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorCronin, Neil
dc.contributor.advisorPiitulainen, Harri
dc.contributor.advisorCenni, Francesco
dc.contributor.authorMustafaoglu, Afet
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-08T06:39:00Z
dc.date.available2023-12-08T06:39:00Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/92224
dc.description.abstractThe main purpose of this study is to explore the feasibility of deep learning based markerless motion capture in clinical settings. This study compares the markerless motion capture (Blazepose) to the gold standard marker-based system (Vicon) by assessing the hip, knee, and ankle joint flexion angles of cerebral palsy (CP) patients and their typically developed (TD) peers. The participant group included six CP patients and six TD individuals. The participants walked on an 8-meter gait path at a self-selected pace. 11 Vicon cameras (200 Hz) and 3 GoPro (60 Hz) cameras were used for the marker-based and markerless system setup. Both systems were synchronized and recorded simultaneously. The keypoint trajectories from Blazepose were obtained by feeding the images collected with GoPros as an input to the algorithm. Further analysis included calibration, 3D reconstruction, and data filtering in Matlab. Skeletal modeling and joint angle calculations were conducted in OpenSim for both systems to eliminate the methodological difference. SPM1D Matlab package was used for statistical analysis. Significant differences were observed in ankle and hip joint angles between the Blazepose and Vicon systems at specific gait cycle phases in both the CP and TD groups. The ankle angle showed significant differences in the CP group at 0.7–1.3% (p<0.016) of the gait cycle and in the TD group at 38–46% (p<0.016). For hip flexion, significant differences in the CP group were noted at 0.81–1.81% (p<0.016), 13–40% (p<0.016), and 89–93% (p<0.016) of the gait cycle, while in the TD group, a significant difference was observed at 75–84% of the gait cycle (p<0.016). No significant difference was observed for the knee angle in both groups. The results of this study highlight the potential use and certain limitations of markerless motion capture systems like Blazepose in clinical settings. While showing promise in certain aspects of joint angle tracking, the study emphasizes the need for more refined datasets and advanced algorithms to enhance the accuracy and reliability of such systems, especially for clinical applications involving CP patients.en
dc.format.extent86
dc.language.isoen
dc.rightsIn Copyright
dc.subject.othermarkerless motion capture
dc.subject.otherclinical gait analysis
dc.titleFeasibility of markerless motion capture in clinical gait analysis in children with cerebral palsy
dc.typemaster thesis
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-202312088223
dc.type.ontasotMaster’s thesisen
dc.type.ontasotPro gradu -tutkielmafi
dc.contributor.tiedekuntaLiikuntatieteellinen tiedekuntafi
dc.contributor.tiedekuntaFaculty of Sport and Health Sciencesen
dc.contributor.laitosLiikunta- ja terveystieteetfi
dc.contributor.laitosSport and Health Sciencesen
dc.contributor.yliopistoJyväskylän yliopistofi
dc.contributor.yliopistoUniversity of Jyväskyläen
dc.contributor.oppiaineBiomekaniikkafi
dc.contributor.oppiaineBiomechanicsen
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
dc.rights.copyright© The Author(s)
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccess
dc.type.publicationmasterThesis
dc.contributor.oppiainekoodi5012
dc.subject.ysosyväoppiminen
dc.subject.ysoliikeoppi
dc.subject.ysoCP-vammaiset
dc.subject.ysoCP-oireyhtymä
dc.subject.ysodeep learning
dc.subject.ysokinematics
dc.subject.ysocerebral palsied
dc.subject.ysocerebral palsy
dc.rights.urlhttps://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

In Copyright
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as In Copyright