dc.contributor.author | Griscom, Bronson | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-01-09T21:51:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-01-09T21:51:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Griscom, B. (2018). Natural Climate Solutions. What are the natural sinks, what capacity they offer, how they can be maximized?. 5th European Congress of Conservation Biology. doi: 10.17011/conference/eccb2018/108188 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/62372 | |
dc.description.abstract | Better stewardship of land is needed to achieve the Paris Climate Agreement goal of holding warming below 2°C; however, confusion persists about the specific set of land stewardship options available and their mitigation potential. To address this, we identify and quantify “natural climate solutions” (NCS): 20 conservation, restoration, and improved land management actions that increase carbon storage and/or avoid greenhouse gas emissions across global forests, wetlands, grasslands, and agricultural lands. We find that the maximum potential of NCS – when constrained by food security, fiber security, and biodiversity conservation – is 23.8 PgCO2e yr-1 (95% CI 20.3 - 37.4). This is ≥30% higher than prior estimates, which did not include the full range of options and safeguards considered here. About half of this maximum (11.3 PgCO2e yr-1) represents cost effective climate mitigation, assuming the social cost of CO2 pollution is ≥100 USD MgCO2e-1 by 2030. Natural climate solutions can provide 37% of cost effective CO2 mitigation needed through 2030 for a >66% chance of holding warming below 2°C. One-third of this cost effective NCS mitigation can be delivered at or below 10 USD MgCO2-1.
We map country-level mitigation potential for 10 priority types of NCS actions. From these maps we identify groups of countries, each with a similar set of dominant NCS opportunities. For some country groups, NCS opportunities are dominated by restoration actions in forests, agricultural lands, and/or wetlands. In others country groups, mitigation potential is dominated by conservation of existing forests, grasslands, and wetlands.
Most NCS actions – if effectively implemented – also offer water filtration, flood buffering, soil health, biodiversity habitat, and enhanced climate resilience. Work remains to better constrain uncertainty of NCS mitigation estimates. Nevertheless, existing knowledge reported here provides a robust basis for immediate global action to improve ecosystem stewardship as a major solution to climate change. | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/html | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Open Science Centre, University of Jyväskylä | |
dc.relation.uri | https://peerageofscience.org/conference/eccb2018/108188/ | |
dc.rights | CC BY 4.0 | |
dc.title | Natural Climate Solutions. What are the natural sinks, what capacity they offer, how they can be maximized? | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.type.uri | http://purl.org/eprint/type/ConferenceItem | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.17011/conference/eccb2018/108188 | |
dc.type.coar | conference paper not in proceedings | |
dc.description.reviewstatus | peerReviewed | |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | |
dc.rights.copyright | © the Authors, 2018 | |
dc.rights.accesslevel | openAccess | |
dc.type.publication | conferenceObject | |
dc.relation.conference | ECCB2018: 5th European Congress of Conservation Biology. 12th - 15th of June 2018, Jyväskylä, Finland | |
dc.format.content | fulltext | |
dc.rights.url | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |