Targeting conservation interventions. Understanding drivers of adoption of Wildlife Management Units (UMAs) in Mexico
Romero, C., Mills, M., Dean, A., Witt, B. and Wilson, K. (2018). Targeting conservation interventions. Understanding drivers of adoption of Wildlife Management Units (UMAs) in Mexico. 5th European Congress of Conservation Biology. doi: 10.17011/conference/eccb2018/107458
© the Authors, 2018
This study focuses on the Wildlife Management Units in Mexico (UMAs), a market-based policy instrument with coupled objectives of biodiversity conservation and rural development through the sustainable use of wildlife. UMAs have been a success story in terms of number of registrations at the national level, but adoption is unevenly distributed across the rural community in Mexico. We use diffusion of innovation theory - the study of how, why and at what rate ideas and practices are adopted by individuals, groups, organizations, or countries - as the theoretical framework to understand drivers of adoption of UMAs by the rural community in Mexico. We ask: what are the characteristics of UMAs that facilitate or hinder adoption of UMAs?; and do those characteristics vary depending on the target population? We triangulate information from three complementary sources: quantitative information from existing government statistics, qualitative information from a review of relevant literature, and qualitative information from semi-structured phone interviews with key informants. We use general elimination methodology (GEM) , a theory-based qualitative evaluation method that seeks to understand the social processes behind the observed outcomes. Theory-based qualitative evaluation methods have been developed in other fields to address attribution of cause and effect when sample sizes are small or there is limited baseline data . Following GEM, we first identify as many as possible alternative explanations or factors influencing adoption of UMAs by reviewing available literature. We then interview key informants from expert groups involved on adoption and implementation of UMAs (e.g. government, NGOs). Finally, we systematically assess whether there is evidence to either validate or rule out each of the possible alternative explanations gathered from the interviews. The results of this research help diagnose the issue of uneven distribution of UMAs across the Mexican rural community, guiding further research on UMAs adoption. This type of research enables practitioners to tailor UMAs to the target population and scale-up conservation through the sustainable use of wildlife where is most needed, and empowers conservation decision makers to achieve their policy objectives. We also hope to spark new directions in conservation research, highlighting the social processes that drive adoption of UMAs by using both an alternative theoretical angle and an innovative methodology within the conservation field. 1. Rogers, E.M., Diffusion of innovations. 2010: New York: Free Press. 2. Scriven, M., A Summative Evaluation of RCT Methodology: & An Alternative Approach to Causal Research. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 2008. 5(9): p. 11-24. 3. White, H. and D. Phillips, Addressing attribution of cause and effect in small n impact evaluations: towards an integrated framework. New Delhi: International Initiative for Impact Evaluation, 2012. ...
PublisherOpen Science Centre, University of Jyväskylä
ConferenceECCB2018: 5th European Congress of Conservation Biology. 12th - 15th of June 2018, Jyväskylä, Finland
MetadataShow full item record
- ECCB 2018 
Showing items with similar title or keywords.
Not all information is equal: Understanding the data drivers behind spatial conservation priorities Kujala, Heini (Open Science Centre, University of Jyväskylä, 2018)Spatial prioritization, where priority areas for conservation actions are identified from a set of candidate locations, is a critical step in many conservation planning problems. How priorities are formed depend on multiple ...
Cusack, Jeremy; Duthie, Brad; Pozo, Rocio; Bunnefeld, Nils (Open Science Centre, University of Jyväskylä, 2018)An increasing number of wildlife populations are the target of intensive management schemes aimed at preventing their extinction or over-abundance, both of which are detrimental to human well-being . These schemes ...
Fijen, Thijs; Scheper, Jeroen; Kleijn, David (Open Science Centre, University of Jyväskylä, 2018)Although agriculture depends critically on biodiversity-based ecosystem services such as insect pollination, conservation of biodiversity in agricultural landscapes has seen little uptake by the agricultural sector. We ...
Piaggio, Antoinette (Open Science Centre, University of Jyväskylä, 2018)Applied conservation genetics is a seemingly ever-evolving field and still highly relevant as many species are lost or further endangered each day. Most recently genomics has added more tools to the conservation geneticist’s ...
Nijhawan, Sahil; Rowcliffe, Marcus; Carbone, Chris; Homewood, Katherine (Open Science Centre, University of Jyväskylä, 2018)Several contesting claims exist about the role of indigenous communities in wildlife conservation. Although cases of local conservation behaviour have been documented, focus has now shifted from labeling indigenous people ...