Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

dc.contributor.advisorHäkkinen, Keijo
dc.contributor.authorSeppänen, Stina
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-21T07:18:09Z
dc.date.available2018-06-21T07:18:09Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/58693
dc.description.abstractTapering is the last part of a periodized training program and the goal of the taper is to peak the performance. A tapering period can be performed in different ways and there are four tapering models which are often used. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of two different tapering models on maximal strength performance and mechanisms behind the changes in performace. The study consisted a one-week control period, an eight-week training period and a two-week tapering period. The subjcts were 21-30-year-old strength trained men. All subjects followed the same training protocol for the first eight weeks and therafter the subjects were divided into two tapering groups: step (group 1) and exponential (group 2). In the step tapering group the training volume was reduced by 54 % at once and was then remained at this level during the both tapering weeks. In the exponential taper group the volume was reduced by 42 % for the first week and by 66 % for the second week. The following measurements were taken before and after the training and tapering period: 1RM squat, 1RM bench press, maximal isometric bilateral leg press, blood samples (CK, testosterone, cortisol, SHBG), EMG of vastus lateralis, cross-sectional area of vastus lateralis and body composition. Both groups increased their 1RM squat (group 1: 13.3±6.94 %, p=0.002; group 2: 15.6±7.05 %, p=0.000) and 1RM bench press (group 1: 9.48±3.62 %, p=0.000; group 2: 10.40±4.63 %, p=0.001) statistically significantly during the eight-week training period. The two-week tapering period led to further statistically significant increases in 1RM squat (group 1: 3.36±2.08 %, p=0.003; group 2: 1.72±0.89 %, p=0.004). There was a positive trend towards significance in improvements of 1RM bench press (group 1: 2.02±2.03 %, p=0.099; group 2: 1.42±1.59 %, p=0.076) after the tapering period. No significant differences were observed between the groups. AEMG of vastus lateralis (1500-2500 ms) increased significantly in group 1 during the taper (post 8-taper 2: 22.59±22.13 % p=0.028; taper 1-taper 2: 24.30±19.32 %, p=0.011). AEMG of VL increased significantly from taper 1 to taper 2 (500-1500 ms: p=0.046; 1500-2500 ms: p=0.015) and there was a positive trend towards significance from post 8 to taper 2 (1500-2500 ms: p=0.080) when the groups were combined. The T/SHBG ratio increased significantly in group 2 after the taper (16.09±10.84 %, p=0.022). Creatine kinase concentration decreased during the taper in both groups (group 1: -41.16±19.56 %, p=0.080: group 2: -15.37±20.51 % p=0.156) and the reduction was significant when the groups were combined (p=0.044). Reduced volume tapering seems to be an effective way to improve maximal strength performance. It seems that both, step and exponential tapers, can lead to improvents in maximal strength. Enhanced recovery of the neuromuscular system, an enhanced hormonal profile and reduced rate of muscle damage may explain the improved strength performance after the taper.en
dc.format.extent85
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.subject.othertapering
dc.subject.othermaximal strength
dc.titleEffects of two different tapering models on maximal strength gains in recreationally strength trained men
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-201806213313
dc.type.ontasotPro gradu -tutkielmafi
dc.type.ontasotMaster’s thesisen
dc.contributor.tiedekuntaLiikuntatieteellinen tiedekuntafi
dc.contributor.tiedekuntaFaculty of Sport and Health Sciencesen
dc.contributor.laitosLiikunta- ja terveystieteetfi
dc.contributor.laitosSport and Health Sciencesen
dc.contributor.yliopistoJyväskylän yliopistofi
dc.contributor.yliopistoUniversity of Jyväskyläen
dc.contributor.oppiaineValmennus- ja testausoppifi
dc.contributor.oppiaineScience in Sport Coaching and Fitness Testingen
dc.rights.copyrightJulkaisu on tekijänoikeussäännösten alainen. Teosta voi lukea ja tulostaa henkilökohtaista käyttöä varten. Käyttö kaupallisiin tarkoituksiin on kielletty.fi
dc.rights.copyrightThis publication is copyrighted. You may download, display and print it for Your own personal use. Commercial use is prohibited.en
dc.rights.accesslevelrestrictedAccess
dc.type.publicationmasterThesis
dc.contributor.oppiainekoodi5013
dc.subject.ysolihasvoima
dc.subject.ysovoimaharjoittelu
dc.subject.ysomuscle strength
dc.subject.ysostrength training
dc.format.contentfulltext
dc.rights.accessrightsTekijä ei ole antanut lupaa avoimeen julkaisuun, joten aineisto on luettavissa vain Jyväskylän yliopiston kirjaston <a href="https://kirjasto.jyu.fi/fi/tyoskentelytilat/laitteet-ja-tilat">arkistotyöasemalta</a>.fi
dc.rights.accessrights<br><br>The author has not given permission to make the work publicly available electronically. Therefore the material can be read only at the archival <a href="https://kirjasto.jyu.fi/en/workspaces/facilities">workstation</a> at Jyväskylä University Library reserved for the use of archival materials.en
dc.type.okmG2


Aineistoon kuuluvat tiedostot

Thumbnail

Aineisto kuuluu seuraaviin kokoelmiin

Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot