Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRohas, Eeva
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-03T14:15:29Z
dc.date.available2016-11-03T14:15:29Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.isbn978-951-39-6779-6
dc.identifier.otheroai:jykdok.linneanet.fi:1611266
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/51813
dc.description.abstractThis study explores the writings of Sylvia Plath Forum, a discussion forum in the Internet that was launched in 1998. Using Norman Fairclough’s critical discourse analysis, Chaïm Perelman’s theory of argumentation, Kenneth Burke’s idea of identification as the basis of rhetoric, and René Girards’s theory of mimetic desire as its framework this study looks into the forum’s meaning-making processes and the ways the author Sylvia Plath (1932-1963) and her readers are represented on the forum. Attention is paid especially to meaning-making practices that are connected with literary studies, feminism, medicalization, and cultic phenomena. Furthermore, cultic discourse and fan discourse are understood in this work as two separate meaning-making practices. The definition of cultic discourse is based on Péter Dávidházi’s (2002) model of cultic reception but René Girard’s theory is also drawn on. The status of the transcendental is of importance in the definition of cultic discourse and the conceptual differentiation between the two discourses. This dissertation argues that cultic discourse has a dominant role in Sylvia Plath Forum’s order of discourse, while the other four discourses are crucial in the argumentation processes that aim at defining and defending the celebrated author’s cultural status and through it also that of her devoted readers. What is interesting in the forum’s writings is that the writers mainly share the conclusion (concerning Plath’s greatness) but argue about the grounds, whereas typically a speaker/writer would try to shift the adherence that certain premises already enjoy to the desired conclusion. Apart from the relatively stable position of cultic discourse, the forum’s order of discourse was in constant flux as the negotiations of meanings, especially the right way to represent Sylvia Plath and her oeuvre, were vibrant from the beginning until the end. The concept of ‘process’ is in many ways crucial: it not only characterizes this study’s understanding of its object but is of importance in the study’s overall definition of culture as an intersubjective communication process based on symbols. Moreover, the study’s perspective is also strongly influenced by René Girard’s mimetic theory in the analysis of aspects of mimetic desire, mediation, and scapegoat mechanism in the research data. However, as a result of its own negotiation of how to approach culture and social interaction, this study partly challenges Girard’s conception of the core of culture as well as the ontological realism of his theory, thus moving towards more open and dialogical points of view.
dc.format.extent1 verkkoaineisto (389 sivua)
dc.language.isofin
dc.publisherUniversity of Jyväskylä
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJyväskylä studies in humanities
dc.subject.otherPlath, Sylvia
dc.subject.otherSylvia Plath Forum
dc.subject.otherliterature
dc.subject.otherreception
dc.subject.otherdiscourse
dc.subject.otherrhetoric
dc.subject.otherrepresentation
dc.subject.othermimesis
dc.subject.otherideology
dc.subject.otherpower
dc.subject.otherconfession
dc.subject.otherdialogue
dc.subject.otherculture
dc.titleSylviasta, Sylvialle, Sylviana : retoriikka ja merkityksenmuodostus osoitteessa www.sylviaplathforum.com
dc.title.alternativeRetoriikka ja merkityksenmuodostus osoitteessa www.sylviaplathforum.com
dc.identifier.urnURN:ISBN:978-951-39-6779-6
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten
dc.type.ontasotVäitöskirjafi
dc.type.ontasotDoctoral dissertationen
dc.contributor.tiedekuntaHumanistinen tiedekuntafi
dc.contributor.yliopistoUniversity of Jyväskyläen
dc.contributor.yliopistoJyväskylän yliopistofi
dc.contributor.oppiaineNykykulttuurin tutkimusfi
dc.relation.issn1459-4331
dc.relation.numberinseries295
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.subject.ysoreseptioestetiikka
dc.subject.ysoretoriikka
dc.subject.ysoargumentaatioteoria
dc.subject.ysomimesis
dc.subject.ysofanius
dc.subject.ysoblogit
dc.subject.ysojulkisuuskuva
dc.subject.ysodiskurssianalyysi
dc.subject.ysokirjailijat
dc.subject.ysoelämäkerrat
dc.subject.ysolyriikka
dc.subject.ysolukijat
dc.subject.ysotulkinta
dc.subject.ysotekstit
dc.subject.ysoverkkokeskustelu


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record