Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHsu, Yi-Fang
dc.contributor.authorBars, Solene Le
dc.contributor.authorHämäläinen, Jarmo
dc.contributor.authorWaszak, Florian
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-30T10:51:00Z
dc.date.available2016-03-26T22:45:05Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationHsu, Y.-F., Bars, S., Hämäläinen, J., & Waszak, F. (2015). Distinctive Representation of Mispredicted and Unpredicted Prediction Errors in Human Electroencephalography. <em>Journal of Neuroscience</em>, 35 (43), 14653-14660. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2204-15.2015">doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2204-15.2015</a>
dc.identifier.otherTUTKAID_67562
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/47505
dc.description.abstractThe predictive coding model of perception proposes that neuronal responses are modulated by the amount of sensory input that the internal prediction cannot account for (i.e., prediction error). However, there is little consensus on what constitutes nonpredicted stimuli. Conceptually, whereas mispredicted stimuli may induce both prediction error generated by prediction that is not perceived and prediction error generated by sensory input that is not anticipated, unpredicted stimuli involves no top-down, only bottom-up, propagation of information in the system. Here, we examined the possibility that the processing of mispredicted and unpredicted stimuli are dissociable at the neurophysiological level using human electroencephalography. We presented participants with sets of five tones in which the frequency of the fifth tones was predicted, mispredicted, or unpredicted. Participants were required to press a key when they detected a softer fifth tone to maintain their attention. We found that mispredicted and unpredicted stimuli are associated with different amount of cortical activity, probably reflecting differences in prediction error. Moreover, relative to predicted stimuli, the mispredicted prediction error manifested as neuronal enhancement and the unpredicted prediction error manifested as neuronal attenuation on the N1 event-related potential component. These results highlight the importance of differentiating between the two nonpredicted stimuli in theoretical work on predictive coding.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSociety for Neuroscience
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Neuroscience
dc.subject.otherneurophysiological processing
dc.subject.othernonpredicted stimuli
dc.subject.otherpredictive coding
dc.titleDistinctive Representation of Mispredicted and Unpredicted Prediction Errors in Human Electroencephalography
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-201510293532
dc.contributor.laitosPsykologian laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosDepartment of Psychologyen
dc.contributor.oppiainePsykologia
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.date.updated2015-10-29T10:15:08Z
dc.type.coarjournal article
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.format.pagerange14653-14660
dc.relation.issn0270-6474
dc.relation.volume35
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2015 the Authors. Published by the Society for Neuroscience. Published in this repository with the kind permission of the publisher.
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccess
dc.relation.doi10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2204-15.2015


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record