dc.contributor.author | Häyrinen, Ari | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-11-02T10:15:26Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-11-02T10:15:26Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-951-39-4908-2 | |
dc.identifier.other | oai:jykdok.linneanet.fi:1238350 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/40157 | |
dc.description.abstract | I study the emergence of traditional online activities of the museums and their
fears in the vivid and multifaceted Internet and how the open Internet is setting
out to compete with museums. The second main topic of this work is the role
of technology in the openness of digital heritage. Technology is always present
when dealing with digital heritage, and understanding the technical framework
is essential when evaluating, for example, long-term preservation issues or accessibility.
I used three different kinds of sources in my study: literary, case studies
and application development. First, I have read studies that are related to digital
heritage: museology literature, museum informatics literature and information
technology studies. Secondly, I studied online digital heritage materials. How
can these be found and who are creating these resources? By whose terms can
they be used? Why some materials are open and why some are not? Lastly,
I have resorted to my own experience as a developer of a cultural heritage information
system and as an open source enthusiast. I created technical proposals
that demonstrate some solutions for documentation, openness and long-term
preservation of digital heritage. I was able to spot several structural issues that
negatively affect the ability of the heritage organisations to participate in the creation
of open digital heritage. These disadvantages can be dubbed an institutional
burden of official heritage institutions. The institutional burden is related
to the practices of organisations, to the official status of these organisations and
to the technology that they use when creating digital materials. I was able to
demonstrate that technical implementations affect the visibility of the museum
materials to search engines, the flexibility of the documentation and long-term
preservation. The issues of the institutional burden are partly linked to these
technical questions. A well-designed information system supports multiple documentation
types, and openness of data does not require extra work, which, in
turn, saves the resources of the organisation. Nevertheless, this requires changes
in the information system design for heritage organisations. | fi |
dc.format.extent | 1 verkkoaineisto (132, 6, 6, 9, 20 sivua). | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | University of Jyväskylä | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Jyväskylä studies in humanities | |
dc.rights | In Copyright | |
dc.subject.other | digital heritage | |
dc.subject.other | open source | |
dc.subject.other | open data | |
dc.title | Open sourcing digital heritage : digital surrogates, museums and knowledge management in the age of open networks | |
dc.type | Diss. | |
dc.identifier.urn | URN:ISBN:978-951-39-4908-2 | |
dc.type.dcmitype | Text | en |
dc.type.ontasot | Väitöskirja | fi |
dc.type.ontasot | Doctoral dissertation | en |
dc.contributor.tiedekunta | Humanistinen tiedekunta | fi |
dc.contributor.tiedekunta | Faculty of Humanities | en |
dc.contributor.yliopisto | University of Jyväskylä | en |
dc.contributor.yliopisto | Jyväskylän yliopisto | fi |
dc.contributor.oppiaine | Digitaalinen kulttuuri | fi |
jyx.note.uri | http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201210042581 | |
dc.relation.issn | 1459-4331 | |
dc.relation.numberinseries | 187 | |
dc.rights.accesslevel | openAccess | |
dc.subject.yso | digitaalinen tallennus | |
dc.subject.yso | verkkojulkaiseminen | |
dc.subject.yso | verkkoaineistot | |
dc.subject.yso | open access | |
dc.subject.yso | museot | |
dc.subject.yso | kulttuuriperintö | |
dc.rights.url | https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/ | |