Profiling moral potency dimensions : A person-centered, multi-sample study
Abstract
This study explores what kinds of moral potency profiles can be identified among three different samples:
Top sports, Leaders, and Followers. Based on the social norm theory, we examine whether and how the
experienced strength of ethical organizational culture is associated with the probability to be identified into
different moral potency profiles. Based on ratings of 188 top sport representatives, 237 leaders and their 202
followers, a person-centered approach was used to identify three moral potency profiles: morally hesitant,
moderate moral potency, and morally confident. A fourth profile was identified based on the followers’
evaluations of their leaders: morally void. Low evaluations of ethical culture increased the likelihood of
being classified into the morally hesitant profile. As the followers were somewhat more critical in evaluating
their leaders’ moral potency than the leaders themselves, our findings highlight the value of including otherrated indicators when examining moral actions within organizations.
Main Authors
Format
Articles
Research article
Published
2024
Series
Subjects
Publication in research information system
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
The permanent address of the publication
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202411127130Use this for linking
Review status
Peer reviewed
ISSN
1833-3672
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2024.64
Language
English
Published in
Journal of Management and Organization
Citation
- Herttalampi, M., Riivari, E., Siltaoja, M., & Feldt, T. (2024). Profiling moral potency dimensions : A person-centered, multi-sample study. Journal of Management and Organization, FirstView. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2024.64
Funder(s)
Ministry of Education and Culture
Ministry of Education and Culture
Funding program(s)
Others
Others
Muut
Muut
Additional information about funding
This paper is based on research projects supported by the Ministry of Education and Culture
(grants OKM/25/626/2022 and OKM/78/626/2015) and by the Finnish Work Environment Fund (grants #110104 and
#108124).
Copyright© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management