Digital interventions to promote psychological resilience : a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Societies are exposed to major challenges at an increasing pace. This underscores the need for preventive measures such as resilience promotion that should be available in time and without access barriers. Our systematic review summarizes evidence on digital resilience interventions, which have the potential to meet these demands. We searched five databases for randomized-controlled trials in non-clinical adult populations. Primary outcomes were mental distress, positive mental health, and resilience factors. Multilevel meta-analyses were performed to compare intervention and control groups at post-intervention and follow-up assessments. We identified 101 studies comprising 20,010 participants. Meta-analyses showed small favorable effects on mental distress, SMD = –0.24, 95% CI [–0.31, –0.18], positive mental health, SMD = 0.27, 95% CI [0.13, 0.40], and resilience factors, SMD = 0.31, 95% CI [0.21, 0.41]. Among middle-aged samples, older age was associated with more beneficial effects at follow-up, and effects were smaller for active control groups. Effects were comparable to those of face-to-face interventions and underline the potential of digital resilience interventions to prepare for future challenges.
Main Authors
Format
Articles
Review article
Published
2024
Series
Subjects
Publication in research information system
Publisher
Springer Nature
The permanent address of the publication
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202403282654Use this for linking
Review status
Peer reviewed
ISSN
2398-6352
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-024-01017-8
Language
English
Published in
npj digital medicine
Citation
- Schäfer, S. K., von Boros, L., Schaubruch, L. M., Kunzler, A. M., Lindner, S., Koehler, F., Werner, T., Zappalà, F., Helmreich, I., Wessa, M., Lieb, K., & Tüscher, O. (2024). Digital interventions to promote psychological resilience : a systematic review and meta-analysis. npj digital medicine, 7, Article 30. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-024-01017-8
Additional information about funding
This work was supported by the European Fonds for Regional Development with the Ministry of Science and Health of Rhineland-Palatinate (grant number 84009588). The funder played no role in the study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation of data, or the writing of this manuscript.. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Copyright© 2024 the Authors