Sixth graders evaluating online texts : self-efficacy beliefs predict confirming but not questioning the credibility
Abstract
This study investigated how sixth graders’ credibility evaluation self-efficacy was associated with their ability to evaluate the credibility of online texts. Students (N = 265, Mage = 12.45) worked in a web-based environment, where they read and evaluated two more credible texts and two less credible texts that required confirming and questioning the texts’ credibility, respectively. Students were asked to evaluate the author’s expertise, the author’s benevolence, and the quality of evidence in each text. They were also asked to assess their credibility evaluation self-efficacy during the task. The structural equation model indicated that students’ self-efficacy was positively associated with their ability to confirm the more credible texts but not with their ability to question the less credible texts. The instructional implications of this study are discussed.
Main Authors
Format
Articles
Research article
Published
2023
Series
Subjects
Publication in research information system
Publisher
Routledge
The permanent address of the publication
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202307064394Käytä tätä linkitykseen.
Review status
Peer reviewed
ISSN
0031-3831
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2023.2228834
Language
English
Published in
Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research
Citation
- Anttonen, R., Räikkönen, E., Kiili, K., & Kiili, C. (2023). Sixth graders evaluating online texts : self-efficacy beliefs predict confirming but not questioning the credibility. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, Early online. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2023.2228834
Additional information about funding
This work was supported by Academy of Finland: [grant no 324524]; The Strategic Research Council: [grant no 335625].
Copyright© 2023 the Authors