Education for planetary well-being
Abstract
The aim of this chapter is to present how education can promote planetary well-being as well as what the adoption of the planetary well-being means for education. The main objective is to explore theoretical perspectives on the new concept education for planetary well-being by examining its underlying philosophical assumptions and by introducing related approaches in the field of education. There exist several initiatives and frameworks that have aimed to make education more sustainable and just, but many of these are based on the concept of sustainable development and have considerable limitations regarding their potential to address the ecological crisis and bring about urgently needed societal changes. Some of these frameworks, however, offer significant resources and are fruitful starting points for interrogating education for planetary well-being as a concept. Essential to education for planetary well-being is the concept of dialogue, which we examine both as an ontological principle and as a pedagogical practice. As a conclusion, education for planetary well-being is argued to be a pathway for replacing the traditional anthropocentric humanism with a wiser form of humanity.
Main Authors
Format
Books
Book part
Published
2024
Subjects
Publication in research information system
Publisher
Routledge
The permanent address of the publication
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202307064387Use this for linking
Parent publication ISBN
978-1-032-36828-3
Review status
Peer reviewed
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003334002-24
Language
English
Is part of publication
Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Planetary Well-Being
Citation
- Aaltonen, V. A., Hiljanen, M., Layne, H., Lehtonen, A., Löyttyniemi, M., Mykrä, N., Virtanen, A. S., & Heikkinen, H. L. (2024). Education for planetary well-being. In M. Elo, J. Hytönen, S. Karkulehto, T. Kortetmäki, J. S. Kotiaho, M. Puurtinen, & M. Salo (Eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Planetary Well-Being (pp. 246-258). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003334002-24
Funder(s)
Research Council of Finland
European Commission
Funding program(s)
Akatemiahanke, SA
IA Innovation Action, H2020
Academy Project, AoF
IA Innovation Action, H2020


Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Education and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA). Neither the European Union nor EACEA can be held responsible for them.
Additional information about funding
The writing of this chapter has been supported by the following research funding: Academy of Finland, Wisdom in Practice project, funded under grant agreement 351238 for Hannu L.T. Heikkinen, Niina Mykrä, and Anu S. Virtanen; European Union’s Green Deal/Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme, ECF-4CLIM project, funded under grant agreement 10103650 for Hannu L.T. Heikkinen, Niina Mykrä, and Anna Lehtonen; Jyväskylä University School of Business and Economics, Grant for doctoral research for Meri Löyttyniemi; Ministry of Education and Culture of Finland, KESTO project, funded under grant agreements OKM/239/523/2020 and OKM/117/523/2020 for Hannu L.T. Heikkinen and Anu S. Virtanen; Wihuri Foundation,grant for doctoral research for Valtteri A. Aaltonen.
Copyright© 2023 the Authors