High Responders to Hypertrophic Strength Training Also Tend to Lose More Muscle Mass and Strength During Detraining Than Low Responders
Räntilä, A., Ahtiainen, J. P., Avela, J., Restuccia, J., Kidgell, D., & Häkkinen, K. (2021). High Responders to Hypertrophic Strength Training Also Tend to Lose More Muscle Mass and Strength During Detraining Than Low Responders. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 35(6), 1500-1511. https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000004044
Julkaistu sarjassa
Journal of Strength and Conditioning ResearchTekijät
Päivämäärä
2021Oppiaine
Valmennus- ja testausoppiBiomekaniikkaScience of Sport Coaching and Fitness TestingBiomechanicsTekijänoikeudet
© 2021 National Strength and Conditioning Association
This study investigated differences in individual responses to muscle hypertrophy during strength training and detraining. Ten weeks of resistance training was followed by 6 weeks of detraining in men (n 5 24). Bilateral leg press (LP) one-repetition maximum (1RM) and maximal electromyography (EMGs) of vastus lateralis (VL) and vastus medialis, maximal voluntary activation (VA), transcranial magnetic stimulation for corticospinal excitability (CE), cross-sectional area of VL (VLCSA), selected serum hormone concentrations were measured before and repeatedly during training and detraining. In the total group, VLCSA increased by 10.7% (p 5 0.025) and LP 1RM by 16.3% (p , 0.0001) after training. The subjects were split into 3 groups according to increases in VLCSA: high responders (HR) . 15% (n 5 10), medium responders (MR) 15–4.5% (n 5 7), and low responders (LR) , 4.5% (n 5 7). Vastus lateralis CSA in HR and MR increased statistically significantly from pre to posttraining but not in LR. Only HR increased LP 1RM statistically significantly from pre to post. Maximal EMG activity increased 21.3 6 22.9% from pre- to posttraining for the total group (p 5 0.009) and for MR (p , 0.001). No significant changes occurred in VA and CE or serum hormone concentrations. During detraining, HR showed a decrease of 210.5% in VLCSA, whereas MR and LR did not. None of the subgroups decreased maximal strength during the first 3 weeks of detraining, whereas HR showed a slight (by 2.5%) rebound in strength. The present results suggest that strength gains and muscle activation adaptations may take place faster in HR and decrease also faster compared with other subgroups during detraining.
...
Julkaisija
Lippincott Williams & WilkinsISSN Hae Julkaisufoorumista
1064-8011Asiasanat
Julkaisu tutkimustietojärjestelmässä
https://converis.jyu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/89729816
Metadata
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedotKokoelmat
- Liikuntatieteiden tiedekunta [3164]
Lisätietoja rahoituksesta
The authors had no external funding.Lisenssi
Samankaltainen aineisto
Näytetään aineistoja, joilla on samankaltainen nimeke tai asiasanat.
-
Training load does not affect detraining's effect on muscle volume, muscle strength and functional capacity among older adults
Roie, Evelien Van; Walker, Simon; Driessche, Stijn Van; Baggen, Remco; Coudyzer, Walter; Bautmans, Ivan; Delecluse, Christophe (Elsevier Inc., 2017)Research underlines the potential of low-load resistance exercise in older adults. However, while the effects of detraining from high-load protocols have been established, it is not known whether gains from low-load training ... -
Effects of Upper Body Eccentric versus Concentric Strength Training and Detraining on Maximal Force, Muscle Activation, Hypertrophy and Serum Hormones in Women
Häkkinen, Keijo; Newton, Robert U.; Walker, Simon; Häkkinen, Arja; Krapi, Sonja; Rekola, Rebekka; Koponen, Päivi; Kraemer, William J.; Haff, G. Gregory; Blazevich, Anthony J.; Nosaka, Kazunori; Ahtiainen, Juha (Uludag University, 2022)Effects of eccentric (ECC) versus concentric (CON) strength training of the upper body performed twice a week for 10 weeks followed by detraining for five weeks on maximal force, muscle activation, muscle mass and serum ... -
Does Taking a Break Matter : Adaptations in Muscle Strength and Size Between Continuous and Periodic Resistance Training
Halonen, Eeli J.; Gabriel, Idda; Kelahaara, Milla M.; Ahtiainen, Juha P.; Hulmi, Juha J. (Wiley, 2024)We aimed to compare the effects of periodic resistance training (RT) and continuous RT on muscle strength and size. Fifty-five healthy, untrained participants (age 32 ± 5 years) were randomized to periodic (PRT, n = 20 ... -
Resistance Training Load Effects on Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Gain : Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
Lopez, Pedro; Radaelli, Regis; Taaffe, Dennis R.; Newton, Robert U.; Galvão, Daniel A.; Trajano, Gabriel S.; Teodoro, Juliana; Kraemer, William J.; Häkkinen, Keijo; Pinto, Ronei S. (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2021)Purpose: To analyse the effect of resistance training (RT) performed until volitional failure with low-, moderate- and high-loads on muscle hypertrophy and muscle strength in healthy adults; and assess the possible ... -
Acute neuromuscular and hormonal responses and long-term adaptations to hypertrophic resistance training : with special reference to constant versus variable resistance
Walker, Simon (University of Jyväskylä, 2012)
Ellei toisin mainittu, julkisesti saatavilla olevia JYX-metatietoja (poislukien tiivistelmät) saa vapaasti uudelleenkäyttää CC0-lisenssillä.