Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDuflot, R.
dc.contributor.authorEyvindson, K.
dc.contributor.authorMönkkönen, M.
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-11T13:43:27Z
dc.date.available2022-01-11T13:43:27Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationDuflot, R., Eyvindson, K., & Mönkkönen, M. (2022). Management diversification increases habitat availability for multiple biodiversity indicator species in production forests. <i>Landscape Ecology</i>, <i>37</i>(2), 443-459. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-021-01375-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-021-01375-8</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_103607120
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/79309
dc.description.abstractContext Forest biodiversity is closely linked to habitat heterogeneity, while forestry actions often cause habitat homogenization. Alternative approaches to even-aged management were developed to restore habitat heterogeneity at the stand level, but how their application could promote habitat diversity at landscape scale remains uncertain. Objectives We tested the potential benefit of diversifying management regimes to increase landscape-level heterogeneity. We hypothesize that different styles of forest management would create a diverse mosaic of forest habitats that would in turn benefit species with various habitat requirements. Methods Forest stands were simulated under business-as-usual management, set-aside (no management) and 12 alternative management regimes. We created virtual landscapes following diversification scenarios to (i) compare the individual performance of management regimes (no diversification), and (ii) test for the management diversification hypothesis at different levels of set-aside. For each virtual landscape, we evaluated habitat availability of six biodiversity indicator species, multispecies habitat availability, and economic values of production. Results Each indicator species responded differently to management regimes, with no single regime being optimal for all species at the same time. Management diversification led to a 30% gain in multispecies habitat availability, relative to business-as-usual management. By selecting a subset of five alternative management regimes with high potential for biodiversity, gains can reach 50%. Conclusions Various alternative management regimes offer diverse habitats for different biodiversity indicator species. Management diversification can yield large gains in multispecies habitat availability with no or low economic cost, providing a potential cost-effective biodiversity tool if the management regimes are thoughtfully selected.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.relation.ispartofseriesLandscape Ecology
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.subject.otherheterogeneity
dc.subject.otherbiodiversity conservation
dc.subject.otherlandscape planning
dc.subject.otherforest management
dc.subject.othersustainable management
dc.subject.otherboreal forest
dc.subject.othertemperate forest
dc.titleManagement diversification increases habitat availability for multiple biodiversity indicator species in production forests
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-202201111087
dc.contributor.laitosBio- ja ympäristötieteiden laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosDepartment of Biological and Environmental Scienceen
dc.contributor.oppiaineEkologia ja evoluutiobiologiafi
dc.contributor.oppiaineResurssiviisausyhteisöfi
dc.contributor.oppiaineEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen
dc.contributor.oppiaineSchool of Resource Wisdomen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.format.pagerange443-459
dc.relation.issn0921-2973
dc.relation.numberinseries2
dc.relation.volume37
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2021 the Authors
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.subject.ysomaisemasuunnittelu
dc.subject.ysokestävä metsätalous
dc.subject.ysometsänhoito
dc.subject.ysoheterogeenisuus
dc.subject.ysomaisemaekologia
dc.subject.ysometsänkäsittely
dc.subject.ysobiodiversiteetti
dc.subject.ysoboreaalinen vyöhyke
dc.subject.ysolauhkea vyöhyke
dc.format.contentfulltext
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p12430
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p24880
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7534
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p19410
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p24317
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p27050
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5496
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p16692
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1623
dc.rights.urlhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.relation.doi10.1007/s10980-021-01375-8
jyx.fundinginformationOpen Access funding provided by University of Jyväskylä (JYU). This work received support from Koneen Säätiö.


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC BY 4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC BY 4.0