Negative and Positive Bias for Emotional Faces : Evidence from the Attention and Working Memory Paradigms
Abstract
Visual attention and visual working memory (VWM) are two major cognitive functions in humans, and they have much in common. A growing body of research has investigated the effect of emotional information on visual attention and VWM. Interestingly, contradictory findings have supported both a negative bias and a positive bias toward emotional faces (e.g., angry faces or happy faces) in the attention and VWM fields. We found that the classical paradigms—that is, the visual search paradigm in attention and the change detection paradigm in VWM—are considerably similar. The settings of these paradigms could therefore be responsible for the contradictory results. In this paper, we compare previous controversial results from behavioral and neuroscience studies using these two paradigms. We suggest three possible contributing factors that have significant impacts on the contradictory conclusions regarding different emotional bias effects; these factors are stimulus choice, experimental setting, and cognitive process. We also propose new research directions and guidelines for future studies.
Main Authors
Format
Articles
Review article
Published
2021
Series
Subjects
Publication in research information system
Publisher
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
The permanent address of the publication
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202106143699Use this for linking
Review status
Peer reviewed
ISSN
2090-5904
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8851066
Language
English
Published in
Neural Plasticity
Citation
- Xu, Q., Ye, C., Gu, S., Hu, Z., Lei, Y., Li, X., Huang, L., & Liu, Q. (2021). Negative and Positive Bias for Emotional Faces : Evidence from the Attention and Working Memory Paradigms. Neural Plasticity, 2021, Article 8851066. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8851066
Funder(s)
Research Council of Finland
Funding program(s)
Postdoctoral Researcher, AoF
Tutkijatohtori, SA

Additional information about funding
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31700948 and No. 31970989) and from the Academy of Finland (No. 333649 to CY).
Copyright© 2021 the Authors