Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTouizrar, Moe
dc.contributor.authorKnoll, Anna Lena
dc.contributor.authorSiedenburg, Kai
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-08T08:50:34Z
dc.date.available2021-06-08T08:50:34Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationTouizrar, M., Knoll, A. L., & Siedenburg, K. (2021). Repetition and Aesthetic Judgment in Post-tonal Music for Large Ensemble and Orchestra. <i>Frontiers in Psychology</i>, <i>12</i>, Article 673706. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.673706" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.673706</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_96699015
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/76316
dc.description.abstractPost-tonal music often poses perceptual and cognitive challenges for listeners, potentially related to the use of relatively uncommon and unfamiliar musical material and compositional processes. As a basic compositional device, repetition affects memory for music and is structured by composers in very different ways across tonal and post-tonal musical repertoires. Of particular concern is whether post-tonal music exhibits mnemonic affordances that allow listeners to experience a sense of global coherence, and whether repetition correlates strongly with aesthetic judgment. Although previous research suggests that repetition impacts aesthetic preference, empirical research has not mapped out the relationship between repetition and aesthetic judgments across a broad set of post-tonal music. Presenting 14 excerpts, grouped into three categories: tonal, modernist, and post-1970, we observed that indications of repetitions in the music for a group of 60 listeners, with and without musical training, showed significant periods of interindividual synchronization. Aesthetic judgments were assessed by means of ratings for the following parameters: familiarity with the piece, confidence of repetition responses, judgments of affordances for easy listening, coherence, similarity of moments, and recognition, as well as listeners’ liking and interest. A principal component analysis (PCA) on the joint question data and the repetition responses suggested that two factors account for 92% of variance in the data. These factors were interpreted as dominated by aesthetic judgment and repetition strength. Linear mixed-effects regression indicated that repetition strength generally differed across excerpt category, with modernist excerpts featuring lower repetition strength compared to both post-1970 and tonal excerpts. Aesthetic preference, on the other hand, was lower for excerpts in both the modernist and post-1970 categories when compared to tonal excerpts. The analysis did not reveal difference in response behavior for repetition responses as a function of musical training, though it indicated higher preference of modernist excerpts with increasing levels of musical training. Overall, the results suggest that the two factors, aesthetic judgment and repetition strength, act as independent determinants in the experience of post-tonal music.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherFrontiers Media SA
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFrontiers in Psychology
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.titleRepetition and Aesthetic Judgment in Post-tonal Music for Large Ensemble and Orchestra
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-202106083530
dc.contributor.laitosMusiikin, taiteen ja kulttuurin tutkimuksen laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosDepartment of Music, Art and Culture Studiesen
dc.contributor.oppiaineMusiikkitiedefi
dc.contributor.oppiaineMusicologyen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.relation.issn1664-1078
dc.relation.volume12
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2021 the Authors
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.subject.ysoarviointi
dc.subject.ysomusiikki
dc.subject.ysokuunteleminen
dc.subject.ysomieltymykset
dc.subject.ysohaasteet (ongelmat)
dc.subject.ysotonaalisuus
dc.subject.ysotoisto
dc.format.contentfulltext
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7413
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1808
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p9106
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p22910
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p6564
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p12381
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p11754
dc.rights.urlhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.relation.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2021.673706
jyx.fundinginformationThis research was supported by a Freigeist Fellowship of the Volkswagen Foundation to KS.
dc.type.okmA1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC BY 4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC BY 4.0