Developing doctoral students' / researchers’ understanding of the journal peer-review process
Hanafizadeh, P., & Shaikh, A. (2021). Developing doctoral students' / researchers’ understanding of the journal peer-review process. International Journal of Management Education, 19(2), Article 100500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100500
Published in
International Journal of Management EducationDate
2021Discipline
Digitaalinen liiketoiminta ja talous (painoala)MarkkinointiDigital marketing and CommunicationBasic or discovery scholarshipDigital Business and Economy (focus area)MarketingDigital marketing and CommunicationBasic or discovery scholarshipAccess restrictions
Embargoed until: 2023-08-01Request copy from author
Copyright
© 2021 Elsevier
A growing body of knowledge has confirmed that the journal peer-review process is an integral part of the scientific publication process and provides demonstrable benefits to journal editors and authors. This study aims to develop doctoral students’ understanding of the journal peer-review process and highlight the most common errors and pitfalls reviewers identify in novice authors’ manuscripts, which could lead to rejection. A qualitative content analysis research method was used to analyse the primary data as experience collected from senior researchers, editors and associate editors. Among the major contributions of this study is an interactive diagram that provides an overview of the journal peer-review process and identifies the common pitfalls in manuscripts, as well as a comprehensive manuscript submission checklist.
Publisher
ElsevierISSN Search the Publication Forum
1472-8117Keywords
Publication in research information system
https://converis.jyu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/52388001
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
- Kauppakorkeakoulu [909]
License
Related items
Showing items with similar title or keywords.
-
Original data for article Kotimaiset tieteelliset julkaisusarjat ja avoimuus (Finnish scientific journals and their openness)
Ylönen, Irene; Anna-Kaarina Linna; Mika Holopainen; Ikonen, ArtoInformation on openness, green open access and copyrights of Finnish scientific journals ranked on levels 1-3 (Jufo classification). Data consists of 336 journals and their policies on open science, open access and ... -
Transparency of peer review : a semi-structured interview study with chief editors from social sciences and humanities
Karhulahti, Veli-Matti; Backe, Hans-Joachim (BioMed Central, 2021)Background Open peer review practices are increasing in medicine and life sciences, but in social sciences and humanities (SSH) they are still rare. We aimed to map out how editors of respected SSH journals perceive open ... -
Do concepts and methods have ethics?
Laihonen, Petteri (Language on the Move, 2020) -
Näkökulmia tiedetoimittamiseen
Reuter, Martina (Sukupuolentutkimuksen seura, 2019) -
Kaksi vuosikymmentä vertaisarvioituja tutkimusartikkeleita
Itkonen, Hannu; Kokkonen, Jouko (Liikuntatieteellinen seura, 2019)