Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSaltychev, Mikhail
dc.contributor.authorKatajapuu, Niina
dc.contributor.authorBärlund, Esa
dc.contributor.authorLaimi, Katri
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-07T12:05:57Z
dc.date.available2021-04-07T12:05:57Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationSaltychev, M., Katajapuu, N., Bärlund, E., & Laimi, K. (2021). Psychometric properties of 12-item self-administered World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) among general population and people with non-acute physical causes of disability : systematic review. <i>Disability and Rehabilitation</i>, <i>43</i>(6), 789-794. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2019.1643416" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2019.1643416</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_32172878
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/74982
dc.description.abstractObjective: WHODAS 2.0 is a unified scale to measuring disability across diseases, countries, and cultures. The objective was to explore the available evidence on the psychometric properties of 12-item self-administered WHODAS 2.0 among a general population and people with non-acute physical causes of disability. Methods: Five databases Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and PsycINFO were searched for papers related to the validity, reliability, responsiveness, minimal clinically important difference or minimal detectable change of 12-item self-administered WHODAS 2.0. In order to avoid missing any potentially relevant studies, the search clauses were left as generic as possible and the refining search was conducted manually. As the review was focusing on chronic physical disorders and general adult population, major psychiatric diagnoses, acute traumas, other acute conditions (e.g., postpartum or pregnancy), hearing loss, progressive neurological disorders, and age <19 years were excluded. The relevancy of the studies was assessed by two independent reviewers. Results: The 14 out of 191 observational studies were considered relevant. The sample sizes varied from 80 up to 31,251 participants. Great diversity was observed in the participants’ health problems. The Cronbach’s alpha was high – up to 0.96. The correlations between WHODAS 2.0 and other disability scales were high. Substantial floor without ceiling effect was reported by two studies. Exploratory factor analysis resulted in a multidimensional structure – up to five factors. The discriminative ability and test–retest reliability of the scale was good. Conclusions: It seems, that the 12-item self-administered WHODAS 2.0 is internally consistent and a reliable scale demonstrating overall good correlation with other measures of disability. However, it appears that it is a multidimensional scale and its total score may represent different combinations of several contributing factors. Thus, the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 can be more reliable when creating a person’s functional profile formed by the 12 individual item scores instead of a single total sum.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDisability and Rehabilitation
dc.rightsCC BY-NC 4.0
dc.subject.otherdisability evaluation
dc.subject.otherinternational classification of functioning
dc.subject.otherdisability and health
dc.subject.otherfunctioning
dc.subject.otherpsychometrics
dc.subject.otherreproducibility of results
dc.subject.otherconsistency
dc.subject.otherfloor effect
dc.subject.otherceiling effect
dc.subject.otherWHODAS
dc.titlePsychometric properties of 12-item self-administered World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) among general population and people with non-acute physical causes of disability : systematic review
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-202104072298
dc.contributor.laitosLiikuntatieteellinen tiedekuntafi
dc.contributor.laitosFaculty of Sport and Health Sciencesen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bc
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.format.pagerange789-794
dc.relation.issn0963-8288
dc.relation.numberinseries6
dc.relation.volume43
dc.type.versionacceptedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2021 Taylor & Francis
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.subject.ysovammaisuus
dc.subject.ysoterveys
dc.subject.ysotoimintarajoitteet
dc.subject.ysopsykometriikka
dc.subject.ysoarviointi
dc.format.contentfulltext
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p6418
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2762
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3472
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p6328
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7413
dc.rights.urlhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.relation.doi10.1080/09638288.2019.1643416
dc.type.okmA2


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC BY-NC 4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC BY-NC 4.0