The Interaction Mechanism of Intrinsically Disordered PP2A Inhibitor Proteins ARPP-16 and ARPP-19 With PP2A
Abstract
Protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) activity is critical for maintaining normal physiological cellular functions. PP2A is inhibited by endogenous inhibitor proteins in several pathological conditions including cancer. A PP2A inhibitor protein, ARPP-19, has recently been connected to several human cancer types. Accordingly, the knowledge about ARPP-19—PP2A inhibition mechanism is crucial for the understanding the disease development and the therapeutic targeting of ARPP-19—PP2A. Here, we show the first structural characterization of ARPP-19, and its splice variant ARPP-16 using NMR spectroscopy, and SAXS. The results reveal that both ARPP proteins are intrinsically disordered but contain transient secondary structure elements. The interaction mechanism of ARPP-16/19 with PP2A was investigated using microscale thermophoresis and NMR spectroscopy. Our results suggest that ARPP—PP2A A-subunit interaction is mediated by linear motif and has modest affinity whereas, the interaction of ARPPs with B56-subunit is weak and transient. Like many IDPs, ARPPs are promiscuous binders that transiently interact with PP2A A- and B56 subunits using multiple interaction motifs. In summary, our results provide a good starting point for future studies and development of therapeutics that block ARPP-PP2A interactions.
Main Authors
Format
Articles
Research article
Published
2021
Series
Subjects
Publication in research information system
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
The permanent address of the publication
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202103312249Käytä tätä linkitykseen.
Review status
Peer reviewed
ISSN
2296-889X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2021.650881
Language
English
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
Citation
- Thapa, C., Roivas, P., Haataja, T., Permi, P., & Pentikäinen, U. (2021). The Interaction Mechanism of Intrinsically Disordered PP2A Inhibitor Proteins ARPP-16 and ARPP-19 With PP2A. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, 8, Article 650881. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2021.650881
Funder(s)
Research Council of Finland
Research Council of Finland
Funding program(s)
Academy Project, AoF
Research costs of Academy Research Fellow, AoF
Akatemiahanke, SA
Akatemiatutkijan tutkimuskulut, SA
![Research Council of Finland Research Council of Finland](/jyx/themes/jyx/images/funders/sa_logo.jpg?_=1739278984)
Additional information about funding
This work was supported by Academy of Finland (283481 to UP, and 288235 to PP), and the University of Jyväskylä Graduate School (CT).
Copyright© 2021 Thapa, Roivas, Haataja, Permi and Pentikäinen