Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

dc.contributor.authorKaukua, Jari
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-12T12:18:52Z
dc.date.available2021-03-12T12:18:52Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationKaukua, J. (2020). Post-Classical Islamic Philosophy – a Contradiction in Terms?. <i>Nazariyat : Journal for the History of Islamic Philosophy and Sciences</i>, <i>6</i>(2), 1-21. <a href="https://doi.org/10.12658/Nazariyat.6.2.M0110en" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.12658/Nazariyat.6.2.M0110en</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_51883055
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/74618
dc.description.abstractThis paper engages critically with Dimitri Gutas’ recent characterization of post-classical Islamic philosophy and theology as a form of paraphilosophy or intellectual activity that merely simulates philosophy. I argue that this view arises from a misguided understanding of the concept of philosophy that should provide the standard for its historiography. In order to avoid a number of problematic consequences, such as gaps in historical continuity or a disconnection from what we understand by philosophy today, we must take our cue from a sufficiently uncontroversial contemporary concept of philosophy instead of any particular historical concept, such as the Peripatetic amalgam of metaphysics, theory of science, and the empirical sciences. Such a strategy provides a sound basis for the inclusion of post-classical thinkers, as well as many classical thinkers who are not falāsifa, in the history of Islamic philosophy without vicious circularity or loss of a normative concept of philosophy.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherScientific Studies Association (ILEM)
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNazariyat : Journal for the History of Islamic Philosophy and Sciences
dc.relation.urihttps://www.nazariyat.org/en/issues/cilt-6-sayi-2/post-klasik-islam-felsefesi-celiskili-bir-i-fade-mi
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 4.0
dc.subject.otherconcept of philosophy
dc.subject.otherGutas, Dimitri
dc.subject.otherhistoriography of Islamic philosophy
dc.subject.otherparaphilosophy
dc.titlePost-Classical Islamic Philosophy – a Contradiction in Terms?
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-202103121961
dc.contributor.laitosYhteiskuntatieteiden ja filosofian laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosDepartment of Social Sciences and Philosophyen
dc.contributor.oppiaineFilosofiafi
dc.contributor.oppiainePhilosophyen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.format.pagerange1-21
dc.relation.issn2148-8088
dc.relation.numberinseries2
dc.relation.volume6
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© Author, 2020
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.relation.grantnumber682779
dc.relation.grantnumber682779
dc.relation.projectidinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/682779/EU//ETI
dc.subject.ysofilosofia
dc.subject.ysohistoria
dc.subject.ysokäsitteet
dc.subject.ysofilosofinen teologia
dc.subject.ysometafysiikka
dc.subject.ysoteologia
dc.subject.ysoislam
dc.format.contentfulltext
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1056
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1780
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2267
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p27245
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1059
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3830
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2082
dc.rights.urlhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.relation.doi10.12658/Nazariyat.6.2.M0110en
dc.relation.funderEuropean Commissionen
dc.relation.funderEuroopan komissiofi
jyx.fundingprogramERC Consolidator Granten
jyx.fundingprogramERC Consolidator Grantfi
jyx.fundinginformationEuropean Commission 682779
dc.type.okmA1


Aineistoon kuuluvat tiedostot

Thumbnail

Aineisto kuuluu seuraaviin kokoelmiin

Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Ellei muuten mainita, aineiston lisenssi on CC BY-NC-ND 4.0