Forest multifunctionality is not resilient to intensive forestry

Abstract
There is ample evidence that intensive management of ecosystems causes declines in biodiversity as well as in multiple ecosystem services, i.e., in multifunctionality. However, less is known about the permanence and reversibility of these responses. To gain insight into whether multifunctionality can be sustained under intensive management, we developed a framework building on the concept of resilience: a system’s ability to avoid displacement and to return or transform to a desired state. We applied it to test the ability of forest multifunctionality to persist during and recover from intensive management for timber production in a boreal forest. Using forest growth simulations and multiobjective optimization, we created alternative future paths where the forest was managed for maximal timber production, for forest multifunctionality, or frst maximal timber production and then multifunctionality. We show that forest multifunctionality is substantially diminished under intensive forestry and recovers the slower, the longer intensive forestry has been continued. Intensive forestry thus not only reduces forest multifunctionality but hinders its recovery should management goals change, i.e., weakens its resilience. The results suggest a need to adjust ecosystem management according to long-term sustainability goals already today.
Main Authors
Format
Articles Research article
Published
2021
Series
Subjects
Publication in research information system
Publisher
Springer
The permanent address of the publication
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202101181140Käytä tätä linkitykseen.
Review status
Peer reviewed
ISSN
1612-4669
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-020-01348-7
Language
English
Published in
European Journal of Forest Research
Citation
  • Pohjanmies, T., Eyvindson, K., Triviño, M., Bengtsson, J., & Mönkkönen, M. (2021). Forest multifunctionality is not resilient to intensive forestry. European Journal of Forest Research, 140(3), 537-549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-020-01348-7
License
CC BY 4.0Open Access
Funder(s)
Kone Foundation
Research Council of Finland
Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry
Funding program(s)
Foundation
Academy Project, AoF
ERA-NET Programmes
Säätiö
Akatemiahanke, SA
ERA-NET, artikla 174 -ohjelmat
Research Council of Finland
Additional information about funding
Open Access funding provided by Natural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE). We are grateful to the Kone Foundation (Project No. 46-10588 to MM), to the Academy of Finland (Project No. 275329 to MM), and to the Finnish Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (FutureBioEcon -project) for funding.
Copyright© The Author(s) 2021

Share