Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

dc.contributor.authorOlkinuora, Alisa
dc.contributor.authorGylling, Annette
dc.contributor.authorAlmusa, Henrikki
dc.contributor.authorEldfors, Samuli
dc.contributor.authorLepistö, Anna
dc.contributor.authorMecklin, Jukka-Pekka
dc.contributor.authorNieminen, Taina Tuulikki
dc.contributor.authorPeltomäki, Päivi
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-21T08:16:18Z
dc.date.available2020-07-21T08:16:18Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationOlkinuora, A., Gylling, A., Almusa, H., Eldfors, S., Lepistö, A., Mecklin, J.-P., Nieminen, T. T., & Peltomäki, P. (2020). Molecular Basis of Mismatch Repair Protein Deficiency in Tumors from Lynch Suspected Cases with Negative Germline Test Results. <i>Cancers</i>, <i>12</i>(7), Article 1853. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12071853" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12071853</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_41608874
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/71210
dc.description.abstractSome 10–50% of Lynch-suspected cases with abnormal immunohistochemical (IHC) staining remain without any identifiable germline mutation of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. MMR proteins form heterodimeric complexes, giving rise to distinct IHC patterns when mutant. Potential reasons for not finding a germline mutation include involvement of an MMR gene not predicted by the IHC pattern, epigenetic mechanism of predisposition, primary mutation in another DNA repair or replication-associated gene, and double somatic MMR gene mutations. We addressed these possibilities by germline and tumor studies in 60 Lynch-suspected cases ascertained through diagnostics (n = 55) or research (n = 5). All cases had abnormal MMR protein staining in tumors but no point mutation or large rearrangement of the suspected MMR genes in the germline. In diagnostic practice, MSH2/MSH6 (MutS Homolog 2/MutS Homolog 6) deficiency prompts MSH2 mutation screening; in our study, 3/11 index individuals (27%) with this IHC pattern revealed pathogenic germline mutations in MSH6. Individuals with isolated absence of MSH6 are routinely screened for MSH6 mutations alone; we found a predisposing mutation in MSH2 in 1/7 such cases (14%). Somatic deletion of the MSH2-MSH6 region, joint loss of MSH6 and MSH3 (MutS Homolog 3) proteins, and hindered MSH2/MSH6 dimerization offered explanations to misleading IHC patterns. Constitutional epimutation hypothesis was pursued in the MSH2 and/or MSH6-deficient cases plus 38 cases with MLH1 (MutL Homolog 1)-deficient tumors; a primary MLH1 epimutation was identified in one case with an MLH1-deficient tumor. We conclude that both MSH2 and MSH6 should be screened in MSH2/6- and MSH6-deficient cases. In MLH1-deficient cases, constitutional epimutations of MLH1 warrant consideration.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCancers
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.subject.otherLynch syndrome
dc.subject.otherDNA mismatch repair
dc.subject.othercolorectal cancer
dc.subject.otherdeep sequencing
dc.titleMolecular Basis of Mismatch Repair Protein Deficiency in Tumors from Lynch Suspected Cases with Negative Germline Test Results
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-202007215364
dc.contributor.laitosLiikuntatieteellinen tiedekuntafi
dc.contributor.laitosFaculty of Sport and Health Sciencesen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.relation.issn2072-6694
dc.relation.numberinseries7
dc.relation.volume12
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2020 the Authors
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.subject.ysoLynchin oireyhtymä
dc.subject.ysosuolistosyövät
dc.subject.ysodiagnostiikka
dc.subject.ysosyöpätaudit
dc.subject.ysopaksusuolisyöpä
dc.subject.ysosyöpägeenit
dc.subject.ysoDNA-metylaatio
dc.format.contentfulltext
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p23697
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p25845
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p416
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p678
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5937
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p23580
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p38350
dc.rights.urlhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.relation.doi10.3390/cancers12071853
jyx.fundinginformationThis work was supported by grants from the Jane and Aatos Erkko Foundation (to J.P.M., T.T.N., and P.P.); the Academy of Finland (grant number 294643 to P.P.); the Finnish Cancer Foundation (to P.P. and J.P.M.); the Sigrid Juselius Foundation (to P.P.); the HiLIFE Fellows 2017-2020 (to P.P.); the Government Research Funding, KUH (to J.P.M.); and the Päivikki and Sakari Sohlberg Foundation (to T.T.N.). The Doctoral Programme of Biomedicine of Helsinki University offered a paid doctoral student position to A.O. Open access funding provided by University of Helsinki.
dc.type.okmA1


Aineistoon kuuluvat tiedostot

Thumbnail

Aineisto kuuluu seuraaviin kokoelmiin

Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

CC BY 4.0
Ellei muuten mainita, aineiston lisenssi on CC BY 4.0