Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

dc.contributor.authorNieminen, Eini
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-18T13:28:20Z
dc.date.available2020-05-18T13:28:20Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.isbn978-951-39-8177-8
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/69051
dc.description.abstractNature’s resources enable the existence of humankind. Due to our very intensive resource extraction, many ecosystem functions are deteriorating and species’ populations, distributions, and assemblages changing, which jeopardize our contemporary societies. Conservation areas effectively slow down these trajectories. However, conservation benefits and costs are often incommensurable, and spatially and temporally unevenly distributed, so their reliable evaluation is complex. I studied how conservation decision-making could produce ecologically, socially, and economically effective and acceptable conservation solutions. I implemented the study in the context of boreal mire conservation network complementation in Finland. Mires need to be set aside as spatially and functionally continuous entities to safeguard their hydrology and long-term existence. In Finland, mires are mostly privately owned and landownership is fragmented within single mires. As a result, conflicts could not be avoided. However, trade-offs between ecological gains, landowners’ conservation preferences, and conservation costs could have been alleviated, if alternative conservation solutions were recognized, their consequences studied, and some of the current legislation revised. Furthermore, not all assumed conflicts proved to be true since landowners of wooded mires did not engage in systematic pre-emptive loggings. The results also show that spatial prioritization methods can fill the science-practice gap by supporting conservation planning and decision-making in diverse ways. They can serve simultaneously as site selection tools and as platforms to decision-making, enhancing sharing and analytical use of expert knowledge. They also allow quantification of interrelationships between different conservation-related factors, which enables informing decision-makers about the consequences of alternative conservation solutions. Boreal mire conservation in Finland reflects the very same challenges than nature conservation around the world, so its solutions can help to resolve global conservation problems. Keywords: Conservation decision-making; involuntary conservation; peatland; pre-emptive behavior; trade-offs; voluntary conservation; Zonation.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherJyväskylän yliopisto
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJYU dissertations
dc.relation.haspart<b>Artikkeli I:</b> Kareksela, S.; Aapala, K.; Alanen, A.; Haapalehto, T.; Kotiaho, J.S.; Lehtomäki, J.; Leikola, N.; Mikkonen, N.; Moilanen, A.; Nieminen, E.; Tuominen, S.; Virkkala, R. (2020). Combining spatial prioritization and expert knowledge facilitates effectiveness of large-scale mire protection process in Finland. <i>Biological Conservation, 241, 108324.</i> DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108324 "target="_blank"> 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108324 </a>. JYX: <a href="https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/67749"target="_blank"> jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/67749</a>.
dc.relation.haspart<b>Artikkeli II:</b> Nieminen, E., Salovaara, K., Halme, P., Kotiaho, J. (2021). No evidence of systematic pre-emptive loggings after notifying landowners of their lands’ conservation potential. <i>Ambio, 50 (2), 465-474.</i> DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01354-4"target="_blank"> 10.1007/s13280-020-01354-4</a>
dc.relation.haspart<b>Artikkeli III:</b> Nieminen, E., Kareksela, S., Halme, P., & Kotiaho, J. S. (2021). Quantifying trade-offs between ecological gains, economic costs, and landowners’ preferences in boreal mire protection. <i>Ambio, Early online.</i> DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-021-01530-0"target="_blank"> 10.1007/s13280-021-01530-0</a>
dc.rightsIn Copyright
dc.subjectluonnonsuojelu
dc.subjectsoidensuojelu
dc.subjectluonnonsuojelualueet
dc.subjectympäristöpolitiikka
dc.subjectympäristöohjelmat
dc.subjectpäätöksenteko
dc.subjectpriorisointi
dc.subjectkustannustehokkuus
dc.subjectmaanomistus
dc.subjectmaanomistajat
dc.subjectpakkolunastus
dc.subjectvapaaehtoisuus
dc.subjectSuomi
dc.subjectconservation decision-making
dc.subjectinvoluntary conservation
dc.subjectpeatland
dc.subjectpre-emptive behavior
dc.subjecttrade-offs
dc.subjectvoluntary conservation
dc.subjectZonation
dc.titleHow to protect nature – Boreal mire conservation in Finland
dc.typeDiss.
dc.identifier.urnURN:ISBN:978-951-39-8177-8
dc.relation.issn2489-9003
dc.rights.copyright© The Author & University of Jyväskylä
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccess
dc.type.publicationdoctoralThesis
dc.format.contentfulltext
dc.rights.urlhttp://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en
dc.date.digitised


Aineistoon kuuluvat tiedostot

Thumbnail

Aineisto kuuluu seuraaviin kokoelmiin

Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

In Copyright
Ellei muuten mainita, aineiston lisenssi on In Copyright