Gray plumage color is more cryptic than brown in snowy landscapes in a resident color polymorphic bird

Abstract
Camouflage may promote fitness of given phenotypes in different environments. The tawny owl (Strix aluco) is a color polymorphic species with a gray and brown morph resident in the Western Palearctic. A strong selection pressure against the brown morph during snowy and cold winters has been documented earlier, but the selection mechanisms remain unresolved. Here, we hypothesize that selection favors the gray morph because it is better camouflaged against predators and mobbers in snowy conditions compared to the brown one. We conducted an online citizen science experiment where volunteers were asked to locate a gray or a brown tawny owl specimen from pictures taken in snowy and snowless landscapes. Our results show that the gray morph in snowy landscapes is the hardest to detect whereas the brown morph in snowy landscapes is the easiest to detect. With an avian vision model, we show that, similar to human perceivers, the brown morph is more conspicuous than the gray against coniferous tree trunks for a mobbing passerine. We suggest that with better camouflage, the gray morph may avoid mobbers and predators more efficiently than the brown morph and thus survive better in snowy environments. As winters are getting milder and shorter in the species range, the selection periods against brown coloration may eventually disappear or shift poleward.
Main Authors
Format
Articles Research article
Published
2020
Series
Subjects
Publication in research information system
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons
The permanent address of the publication
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202002062013Use this for linking
Review status
Peer reviewed
ISSN
2045-7758
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5914
Language
English
Published in
Ecology and Evolution
Citation
  • Koskenpato, K., Lehikoinen, A., Lindstedt, C., & Karell, P. (2020). Gray plumage color is more cryptic than brown in snowy landscapes in a resident color polymorphic bird. Ecology and Evolution, 10(4), 1751-1761. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5914
License
CC BY 4.0Open Access
Funder(s)
Research Council of Finland
Funding program(s)
Centre of Excellence, AoF
Huippuyksikkörahoitus, SA
Research Council of Finland
Additional information about funding
AL and PK were funded by the Academy of Finland (projects 275606 and 314108, respectively). KK was funded by Jenny and Antti Wihuri Foundation, Oskar Öflunds Foundation, and Societas pro Fauna et Flora Fennica. CLK was funded by the Academy of Finland via the Centre of Excellence in Biological Interactions.
Copyright© 2019 The Authors

Share