Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

dc.contributor.authorKareksela, S.
dc.contributor.authorAapala, K.
dc.contributor.authorAlanen, A.
dc.contributor.authorHaapalehto, T.
dc.contributor.authorKotiaho, J.S.
dc.contributor.authorLehtomäki, J.
dc.contributor.authorLeikola, N.
dc.contributor.authorMikkonen, N.
dc.contributor.authorMoilanen, A.
dc.contributor.authorNieminen, E.
dc.contributor.authorTuominen, S.
dc.contributor.authorVirkkala, R.
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-05T09:31:16Z
dc.date.available2020-02-05T09:31:16Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationKareksela, S., Aapala, K., Alanen, A., Haapalehto, T., Kotiaho, J.S., Lehtomäki, J., Leikola, N., Mikkonen, N., Moilanen, A., Nieminen, E., Tuominen, S., & Virkkala, R. (2020). Combining spatial prioritization and expert knowledge facilitates effectiveness of large-scale mire protection process in Finland. <i>Biological Conservation</i>, <i>241</i>, Article 108324. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108324" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108324</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_33648927
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/67749
dc.description.abstractConservation resource allocation involves a complex set of considerations including species, habitats, connectivity, local to global biodiversity objectives, alternative protection and restoration actions, while requiring cost-efficiency and effective implementation. We present a national scale spatial conservation prioritization analysis for complementing the network of protected mires in Finland. We show how spatial prioritization coupled with regional targets and expert knowledge can facilitate structured decision-making. In our application, discussion between experts was structured around the prioritization model enabling integration of quantitative analysis with expert knowledge. The used approach balances requirements of many biodiversity features over large landscapes, while aiming at a cost-effective solution. As a special analytical feature, mire complexes were defined prior to prioritization to form hydrologically functional planning units, including also their drained parts that require restoration for the planning unit to remain or potentially increase in value. This enabled selection of mires where restoration effort is supporting and benefitting from the core mire areas of high conservation value. We found that a key to successful implementation was early on structured co-producing between analysts, mire experts, and decision-makers. This allowed effective multidirectional knowledge transfer and evaluation of trade-offs related to the focal conservation decisions. Quantitative trade-off information was seen especially helpful by the stakeholders to decide how to follow the analysis results. Overall, we illustrate a realistic and applicable spatial conservation prioritization case supporting real world conservation decision-making. The introduced approach can be applied globally to increase effectiveness of large-scale protection and management planning of the diverse wetland ecosystem complexes.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBiological Conservation
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 4.0
dc.subject.otherspatial prioritization
dc.subject.othertrade-offs
dc.subject.otherimplementation
dc.subject.otherexpert knowledge
dc.subject.otherrestoration prioritization
dc.subject.othermires
dc.titleCombining spatial prioritization and expert knowledge facilitates effectiveness of large-scale mire protection process in Finland
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-202002051997
dc.contributor.laitosBio- ja ympäristötieteiden laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosDepartment of Biological and Environmental Scienceen
dc.contributor.oppiaineEkologia ja evoluutiobiologiafi
dc.contributor.oppiaineEvoluutiotutkimus (huippuyksikkö)fi
dc.contributor.oppiaineEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen
dc.contributor.oppiaineCentre of Excellence in Evolutionary Researchen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.relation.issn0006-3207
dc.relation.volume241
dc.type.versionacceptedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2020 Elsevier BV
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.subject.ysopriorisointi
dc.subject.ysosuot
dc.subject.ysototeutus
dc.subject.ysosoidensuojelu
dc.subject.ysoasiantuntijapalvelut
dc.subject.ysopaikkatietoanalyysi
dc.subject.ysopäätöksenteko
dc.format.contentfulltext
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p15620
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p10981
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p23615
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3364
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p16016
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p28516
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p8743
dc.rights.urlhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108324
jyx.fundinginformationWe also wish to thank the Finnish Ministry of the Environmentfor funding “MetZo II” and “SUMI” (Evaluating the protected area network in the chamgimg climate) -projects.
dc.type.okmA1


Aineistoon kuuluvat tiedostot

Thumbnail

Aineisto kuuluu seuraaviin kokoelmiin

Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Ellei muuten mainita, aineiston lisenssi on CC BY-NC-ND 4.0