Languagised Repertoires : How Fictional Languages Have Real Effects

Abstract
It is now widely acknowledged in a range of linguistic disciplines that ‘languages’ are sociohistorical constructs rather than ontologically real entities. While this insight has contributed in important ways to challenging the monolingual bias in linguistics, a simplistic dismissal of the notion of ‘languages’ is unhelpful when trying to explain its status and function as a sociocultural, metalinguistic construct. This chapter draws on insights from linguistic anthropology as well as usage-based perspectives on language learning to argue that language use always involves an evaluative dimension linked with sociocultural conventions, and that it is such language use that forms the basis of language learning. It is suggested that sociocultural contexts with a strong discursive orientation to ‘languages’ result in ‘languagised’ individual repertoires that mediate the kind of multilingual language use speakers engage in. The theoretical discussion is illustrated by examples from an interview study with highly proficient adult speakers of Finnish as a second language.
Main Authors
Format
Books Book part
Published
2019
Series
Subjects
Publication in research information system
Publisher
Routledge
The permanent address of the publication
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201907293688Käytä tätä linkitykseen.
Parent publication ISBN
978-1-138-60297-7
Review status
Peer reviewed
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429469312-3
Language
English
Published in
Routledge Critical Studies in Multilingualism
Is part of publication
Critical Perspectives on Linguistic Fixity and Fluidity : Languagised Lives
Citation
  • Ruuska, K. (2019). Languagised Repertoires : How Fictional Languages Have Real Effects. In J. Jaspers, & M. Madsen (Eds.), Critical Perspectives on Linguistic Fixity and Fluidity : Languagised Lives (pp. 53-75). Routledge. Routledge Critical Studies in Multilingualism. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429469312-3
License
In CopyrightOpen Access
Additional information about funding
This research was supported in part by a personal grant from Kone Foundation.
Copyright© 2019 Taylor & Francis

Share