Forest management optimization across spatial scales to reconcile economic and conservation objectives
Pohjanmies, T., Eyvindson, K., & Mönkkönen, M. (2019). Forest management optimization across spatial scales to reconcile economic and conservation objectives. PLoS ONE, 14 (6), e0218213. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0218213
Published inPLoS ONE
DisciplineEkologia ja evoluutiobiologia
© 2019 Pohjanmies et al.
Conflicts between biodiversity conservation and resource production can be mitigated by multi-objective management planning. Optimizing management for multiple objectives over larger land areas likely entails trading off the practicability of the process against the goodness of the solution. It is therefore worthwhile to resolve how large areas are required as management planning regions to reconcile conflicting objectives as effectively as possible. We aimed to reveal how the extent of forestry planning regions impacts the potential to mitigate a forestry-conservation conflict in Finland, represented as a trade-off between harvest income and deadwood availability. We used forecasted data from a forest simulator, a hierarchy of forestry planning regions, and an optimization model to explore the production possibility frontier between harvest income and deadwood. We compared the overall outcomes when management was optimized within the different-sized planning regions in terms of the two objectives, the spatial variation of deadwood, and the optimal combinations of management regimes. Increasing the size of the planning regions did produce higher simultaneous levels of the two objectives, but the differences were most often of the magnitude of only a few percentages. The differences among the scales were minor also in terms of the spatial variation in deadwood availability and in the optimal management combinations. The conflict between timber harvesting and deadwood availability is only marginally easier to mitigate at large spatial scales than at small forest ownership scales. However, regardless of the spatial scale of planning, the achievable solutions may not be good enough to safeguard deadwood-dependent biodiversity without active deadwood creation. ...
PublisherPublic Library of Science
MetadataShow full item record
Showing items with similar title or keywords.
Mazziotta, Adriano (University of Jyväskylä, 2014)
Pohjanmies, Tähti (University of Jyväskylä, 2018)Finnish forests are used extensively for timber production but are also providers of other ecosystem services and harbor unique biodiversity. The ecosystem services approach has so far been used marginally in the context ...
Data from: Forest management optimization across spatial scales to reconcile economic and conservation objectives Eyvindson, Kyle; Pohjanmies, Tähti; Mönkkönen, Mikko (University of Jyväskylä, 2019-05-23)
Pohjanmies, Tähti; Triviño, María; Le tortorec, Eric; Mazziotta, Adriano; Snäll, Tord; Mönkkönen, Mikko (Springer, 2017)Forests are widely recognized as major providers of ecosystem services, including timber, other forest products, recreation, regulation of water, soil and air quality, and climate change mitigation. Extensive tracts of ...
More is more? : Forest management allocation at different spatial scales to mitigate conflicts between ecosystem services Pohjanmies, Tähti; Eyvindson, Kyle; Triviño, María; Mönkkönen, Mikko (Springer Netherlands, 2017)Context: Multi-objective management can mitigate conflicts among land-use objectives. However, the effectiveness of a multi-objective solution depends on the spatial scale at which land-use is optimized. This is because ...