Are we who we cite? : on epistemological injustices, citing practices, and #metoo in academia
Abstract
The #metoo movement reaching academia and Applied Linguistics creates a need for
discussion on how we as scholars react to oppressive ideologies and behaviors in our
community. However, this is not merely a question of processing cases of sexual
harassment and assault. More deeply, we need conversations on who we do and do
not know, read, and cite, and how to make our field more epistemologically equitable.
This article hopes to elicit comments, reactions, and dialogue.
Main Author
Format
Articles
Journal article
Published
2019
Series
Subjects
Publication in research information system
Publisher
Centre for Applied Language Studies, University of Jyväskylä
The permanent address of the publication
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201905222717Käytä tätä linkitykseen.
Review status
Non-peer reviewed
ISSN
1457-9863
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17011/apples/urn.201905092524
Language
English
Published in
Apples : Journal of Applied Language Studies
Citation
- Ennser-Kananen, J. (2019). Are we who we cite? : on epistemological injustices, citing practices, and #metoo in academia. Apples : Journal of Applied Language Studies, 13(2), 65-69. https://doi.org/10.17011/apples/urn.201905092524
License
Copyright© The author, 2019