Enabling ecological intensification of agriculture through policy
Dicks, L. (2018). Enabling ecological intensification of agriculture through policy. 5th European Congress of Conservation Biology. doi: 10.17011/conference/eccb2018/108152
Tekijät
Päivämäärä
2018Tekijänoikeudet
© the Authors, 2018
Ecological intensification is an innovative, knowledge-based approach to agriculture. It combines emerging understanding of how agro-ecosystems function with agronomic knowledge, to manage agricultural ecosystems in a way that secures high yields with reduced environmental impacts.
Policy makers have an interest in ecological intensification, as it can help them respond to multiple international targets and strategies implemented this decade to improve sustainability. It can deliver elements of the second Sustainable Development Goal, ‘Zero Hunger’, which includes a target to ‘ensure sustainable food production systems … that increase productivity and production, help maintain ecosystems …… and progressively improve land and soil quality’. In contrast to more technological, production-focused views of sustainable agriculture sometimes called ‘sustainable intensification’ [1], it represents a set of ‘nature-based solutions’ for agriculture. Nature-based solutions are prominent in the European Union’s Research and Innovation policy agenda. Ecological intensification is also recommended as a policy option to mitigate declines in wild pollinators globally [2].
Several available routes to promote or enable ecological intensification in agriculture are much discussed. They include voluntary financial incentives for farmers (e.g. agri-environment schemes in Europe or conservation measures financed by the Farm Bill in the US); obligations for farmers, such as compulsory greening measures in the European Common Agricultural Policy; and market-based instruments such as certification schemes or ‘Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES)’.
However, none of these options gets to the essence of ecological intensification. The underlying idea is that farmers themselves manage ecosystem services actively and knowingly, to support their own productive systems. Ecological intensification should not have a cost, which requires compensation or additional income from market prices. It should pay for itself, in reduced inputs and enhanced productivity, and indeed it has been shown to do so, albeit in only a small number of studies so far [3]. What is actually needed to enable ecological intensification are policies to support farmer education and training, provision of ecological advice and trans-disciplinary agricultural research to investigate what measures are feasible and provide reliable returns on farm.
References
[1] Dicks L.V., et al. (in review). What agricultural practices are most likely to deliver ‘sustainable intensification’ in the UK? Food and Energy Security.
[2] Dicks, L. V., et al. (2016). Ten policies for pollinators. Science, 354(6315), 975-976.
[3] Pywell, R. F., et al. (2015). Wildlife-friendly farming increases crop yield: evidence for ecological intensification. Proc. Roy. Soc. B, 282(1816).
...
Julkaisija
Open Science Centre, University of JyväskyläKonferenssi
ECCB2018: 5th European Congress of Conservation Biology. 12th - 15th of June 2018, Jyväskylä, Finland
Alkuperäislähde
https://peerageofscience.org/conference/eccb2018/108152/Metadata
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedotKokoelmat
- ECCB 2018 [712]
Lisenssi
Samankaltainen aineisto
Näytetään aineistoja, joilla on samankaltainen nimeke tai asiasanat.
-
The new European Parliament : the Common Agricultural Policy under codecision after the Treaty of Lisbon
Sargento Freitas, Luís (Jyväskylän yliopisto, 2018)In this thesis, a long analysis has been undertaken that has dealt with a multitude of issues pertaining to the EU, European integration theories, codecision, the Lisbon treaty, the Common Agricultural Policy, transports ... -
Shared socioeconomic pathways for climate change research in Finland : co-developing extended SSP narratives for agriculture
Lehtonen, Heikki S.; Aakkula, Jyrki; Fronzek, Stefan; Helin, Janne; Hildén, Mikael; Huttunen, Suvi; Kaljonen, Minna; Niemi, Jyrki; Palosuo, Taru; Pirttioja, Nina; Rikkonen, Pasi; Varho, Vilja; Carter, Timothy R. (Springer, 2021)Shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs), developed at global scale, comprise narrative descriptions and quantifications of future world developments that are intended for climate change scenario analysis. However, their ... -
Language Education Policies and Early Childhood Education
Palviainen, Åsa; Lan Curdt-Christiansen, Xiao (Springer, 2020)This chapter discusses the importance of different types of early language education in the public system according to national policy in two geopolitical contexts: Continental Northern Europe and the UK. We define early ... -
Supplementary data for: Improved camouflage through ontogenetic colour change confers reduced detection risk in shore crabs
Nokelainen, Ossi; Maynes, Ruth; Mynott, Sara; Price, Natasha; Stevens, Martin (University of Jyväskylä, Open Science Centre. jyx@jyu.fi, 2019)Many animals change appearance with age but the reasons why are rarely tested. Common shore crabs (Carcinus maenas), for example, are known for their ability to change colour over time. Young crabs show remarkable variation ... -
An invasive species, Carassius gibelio, alters the native fish community through trophic niche competition
Özdilek, Şükran Yalçın; Partal, Nurbanu; Jones, Roger (Springer International Publishing, 2019)Carbon and nitrogen stable isotope analyses were used to determine isotopic niche width of the invasive fish species Carassius gibelio to help assess the niche overlap and potential impact of this species on the native ...
Ellei toisin mainittu, julkisesti saatavilla olevia JYX-metatietoja (poislukien tiivistelmät) saa vapaasti uudelleenkäyttää CC0-lisenssillä.