High-precision measurement of the mass difference between 102Pd and 102Ru

Abstract
The Q-value for the neutrinoless double electron capture on 102Pd, Qϵϵ(102Pd), is determined as the atomic mass difference between 102Pd and 102Ru. A precise measurement of the Qϵϵ(102Pd) at the SHIPTRAP Penning trap showed a more than 10σ deviation to the adopted Atomic Mass Evaluation (AME) value. The reliability of the SHIPTRAP measurement was challenged because the AME value was based on numerous experiments including β and electron capture decays and very precise (n, γ) data, all agreeing with each other. To solve the discrepancy, the Qϵϵ(102Pd) has now been determined with the JYFLTRAP Penning trap at the IGISOL facility in the Accelerator Laboratory of the University of Jyväskylä. The measurement was performed both with the Time-of-Flight and the Phase-Imaging Ion Cyclotron Resonance techniques. The obtained result, Qϵϵ(102Pd) = 1203.472(45) keV, is eight times more precise and agrees well with the value obtained at SHIPTRAP, Qϵϵ(102Pd) = 1203.27(36) keV, confirming that 102Pd is not a good candidate for a search for neutrinoless double-electron capture.
Main Authors
Format
Articles Research article
Published
2019
Series
Subjects
Publication in research information system
Publisher
Elsevier BV
The permanent address of the publication
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201811134688Use this for linking
Review status
Peer reviewed
ISSN
1387-3806
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2018.10.038
Language
English
Published in
International Journal of Mass Spectrometry
Citation
  • Nesterenko, D., Canete, L., Eronen, T., Jokinen, A., Kankainen, A., Novikov, Yu.N., Rinta-Antila, S., de Roubin, A., & Vilén, M. (2019). High-precision measurement of the mass difference between 102Pd and 102Ru. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry, 435, 204-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2018.10.038
License
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0Open Access
Funder(s)
Research Council of Finland
Research Council of Finland
Research Council of Finland
Research Council of Finland
Research Council of Finland
Funding program(s)
Akatemiatutkija, SA
Akatemiatutkija, SA
Akatemiatutkijan tutkimuskulut, SA
Akatemiatutkijan tutkimuskulut, SA
Akatemiatutkijan tutkimuskulut, SA
Academy Research Fellow, AoF
Academy Research Fellow, AoF
Research costs of Academy Research Fellow, AoF
Research costs of Academy Research Fellow, AoF
Research costs of Academy Research Fellow, AoF
Research Council of Finland
Additional information about funding
This work has been supported by the Academy of Finland by the project “State-of-the-art ion beam developments for JYFL-ACCLAB”, decision No. 273526. A.K. acknowledges the support from the Academy of Finland under Grant No. 275389 and D.N. and L.C. under Grant Nos. 284516 and 312544 . T.E. acknowledges the support from the Academy of Finland under Grant No. 295207 and A.R. under Grant No. 306980 .
Copyright© 2018 Elsevier B.V.

Share