Puhetta arvioinnista : yleisten kielitutkintojen arvioijien käsityksiä arvioinnista

Abstract
This paper focuses on raters’ beliefs and views of assessment and the factors influencing their judgments and performance as raters in the National Certificates of Language Proficiency (NCLP) Finnish language test. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews (N=18) and content analysis was used to classify the responses. Findings suggest that raters’ experience and training have positive effects on rater performance and the use of assessment criteria. Experienced raters seem to be more familiar with different language proficiency levels and their view of language is more holistic today than during the first years of their rating experience. There are some external factors and linguistic features that affect raters’ performance, such as pronunciation, handwriting and the test-taker’s personality. In these cases, self-reflection helps raters to strive for objectivity in their evaluations.
Main Author
Format
Books Book part
Published
2016
Series
Subjects
Publication in research information system
Publisher
Suomen soveltavan kielitieteen yhdistys
Original source
http://journal.fi/afinla/article/view/60848
The permanent address of the publication
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201704041887Use this for linking
Parent publication ISBN
978-951-9388-64-9
Review status
Peer reviewed
ISSN
1798-7822
Language
Finnish
Published in
AFinLA-e : soveltavan kielitieteen tutkimuksia
Is part of publication
Kielitaidon arviointitutkimus 2000-luvun Suomessa
Citation
  • Ahola, S. (2016). Puhetta arvioinnista : yleisten kielitutkintojen arvioijien käsityksiä arvioinnista. In A. Huhta, & R. Hildén (Eds.), Kielitaidon arviointitutkimus 2000-luvun Suomessa (pp. 89-109). Suomen soveltavan kielitieteen yhdistys. AFinLA-e : soveltavan kielitieteen tutkimuksia, 9. http://journal.fi/afinla/article/view/60848
License
Open Access
Copyright© Ahola & Suomen soveltavan kielitieteen yhdistys, 2016.

Share