Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

dc.contributor.authorRosso, Valeria
dc.contributor.authorGastaldi, L.
dc.contributor.authorRapp, W.
dc.contributor.authorLindinger, S.
dc.contributor.authorVanlandewijck, Y.
dc.contributor.authorLinnamo, Vesa
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-05T09:24:49Z
dc.date.available2017-11-11T22:45:08Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationRosso, V., Gastaldi, L., Rapp, W., Lindinger, S., Vanlandewijck, Y., & Linnamo, V. (2017). Biomechanics of simulated versus natural cross-country sit skiing. <i>Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology</i>, <i>32</i>, 15-21. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2016.11.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2016.11.002</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_26312212
dc.identifier.otherTUTKAID_71703
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/52183
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to investigate the biomechanics of cross-country sit-skiing in simulated and natural skiing. Thirteen international level athletes participated in a ski ergometer test (simulated conditions) and a test on snow in a ski-tunnel (natural conditions) using their personal sit-ski. Tests in both conditions were performed at individual maximal speed. When comparing the two conditions the main results were: (1) maximal speed in simulated conditions was lower (p < 0.05) but correlated well with the natural condition (r = 0.79, p < 0.001); (2) no differences in pole force variables were found; peak force (r = 0.77, p < 0.01) and average force (r = 0.78, p < 0.01) correlated well; (3) recovery time and time to peak did not differ and time to impact correlated with each other (r = 0.88, p < 0.01); (4) no differences were found in peak electromyography (EMG) and average EMG for Triceps, Pectoralis, and Erector Spinae; Rectus Abdominis did not differ in peak. EMG peak and average EMG of all muscles were correlated between the two conditions (r = 0.65–0.94; p < 0.05–0.01). Although some differences were observed, this study demonstrated that technical skill proficiency in natural and simulated cross-country skiing is comparable from a force production and muscle activation perspective.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd; International Society of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
dc.subject.otherparalympics
dc.subject.otherimpairment
dc.subject.otherergometer
dc.subject.otherEMG
dc.titleBiomechanics of simulated versus natural cross-country sit skiing
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-201611284812
dc.contributor.laitosLiikuntatieteellinen tiedekuntafi
dc.contributor.laitosFaculty of Sport and Health Sciencesen
dc.contributor.oppiaineBiomekaniikkafi
dc.contributor.oppiaineBiomechanicsen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.date.updated2016-11-28T16:15:52Z
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.format.pagerange15-21
dc.relation.issn1050-6411
dc.relation.numberinseries0
dc.relation.volume32
dc.type.versionacceptedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. This is a final draft version of an article whose final and definitive form has been published by Elsevier. Published in this repository with the kind permission of the publisher.
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.jelekin.2016.11.002
dc.type.okmA1


Aineistoon kuuluvat tiedostot

Thumbnail

Aineisto kuuluu seuraaviin kokoelmiin

Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot