The comparison of cold-water immersion and cold air therapy on maximal cycling performance and recovery markers following strength exercises

Abstract
This study examined the effects of cold-water immersion (CWI) and cold air therapy (CAT) on maximal cycling performance (i.e. anaerobic power) and markers of muscle damage following a strength training session. Twenty endurance-trained but strength-untrained male (n = 10) and female (n = 10) participants were randomised into either: CWI (15 min in 14 C water to iliac crest) or CAT (15 min in 14 C air) immediately following strength training (i.e. 3 sets of leg press, leg extensions and leg curls at 6 repetition maximum, respectively). Creatine kinase, muscle soreness and fatigue, isometric knee extensor and flexor torque and cycling anaerobic power were measured prior to, immediately after and at 24 (T24), 48 (T48) and 72 (T72) h post-strength exercises. No significant differences were found between treatments for any of the measured variables (p > 0.05). However, trends suggested recovery was greater in CWI than CAT for cycling anaerobic power at T24 (10% ± 2%, ES = 0.90), T48 (8% ± 2%, ES = 0.64) and T72 (8% ± 7%, ES = 0.76). The findings suggest the combination of hydrostatic pressure and cold temperature may be favourable for recovery from strength training rather than cold temperature alone.
Main Authors
Format
Articles Research article
Published
2016
Series
Subjects
Publication in research information system
Publisher
PeerJ Inc.
The permanent address of the publication
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201605042423Käytä tätä linkitykseen.
Review status
Peer reviewed
ISSN
2167-8359
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1841
Language
English
Published in
PeerJ
Citation
  • Hayter, K. J., Doma, K., Schumann, M., & Deakin, G. B. (2016). The comparison of cold-water immersion and cold air therapy on maximal cycling performance and recovery markers following strength exercises. PeerJ, 4, Article e1841. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1841
License
Open Access
Copyright© 2016 Hayter et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0.

Share