University of Jyväskylä | JYX Digital Repository

  • English  | Give feedback |
    • suomi
    • English
 
  • Login
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
View Item 
  • JYX
  • Artikkelit
  • Koulutuksen tutkimuslaitos - KTL
  • View Item
JYX > Artikkelit > Koulutuksen tutkimuslaitos - KTL > View Item

What is (good) practitioner research?

ThumbnailFinal Draft
View/Open
231.9 Kb

Downloads:  
Show download detailsHide download details  
Heikkinen, H. L., Jong, F. P. C. M. D., & Vanderlinde, R. (2016). What is (good) practitioner research?. Vocations and Learning, 9(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-016-9153-8
Published in
Vocations and Learning
Authors
Heikkinen, Hannu L.T. |
Jong, Frank P. C. M. de |
Vanderlinde, Ruben
Date
2016
Discipline
Koulutuksen tutkimuslaitosFinnish Institute for Educational Research
Copyright
© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016. This is a final draft version of an article whose final and definitive form has been published by Springer. Published in this repository with the kind permission of the publisher.

 
This special issue recognizes EAPRIL as being a platform for practitioner and practice-based research and by organizing the 10th annual conference for practitioner research on improving learning in education and professional practice. Papers in this conference and in this special issue are rooted in practice-based research or practitioner research. They reflect the popularity of practitioner research in vocational teacher education and in universities of applied sciences. Reason enough for the authors of the current paper to reflect on the question: “What is practitioner research?” And, more importantly what makes good practitioner research? Reviews show that people use broad interpretations of the concept, which requires that to clarify the epistemological basis of the relation between research and practice the reflections goes back to Aristotle philosophy. The latter, aiming at discovering what kind of knowledge is obtained, what purpose it serve, and how it differs. This yields a theoretical, and two practical kinds of knowledge. Although all three are relevant, the so called ‘practitioner knowledge’ (the prhonesis and the techne), need more attention in judging the ‘goodness’ of practitioner research. Five principles of validation are mentioned, e.g. the process of meaning making and negotiation, differing from the correspondence between knowledge and the outside world, e.g. validity. These principles provide a possible angle and sometimes researcher follow them implicitly and unconsciously. The articles in this special issue reflects the realisation of many of these principles within the individual studies. The current paper does not intent to give final answers, but rather to trigger a further conversation on the fundamental question of: What is good practitioner research? ...
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
ISSN Search the Publication Forum
1874-785X
Keywords
practitioner research practice based research theoria techne phronesis praxis validation principles reliability validiteetti
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-016-9153-8
URI

http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201604202271

Publication in research information system

https://converis.jyu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/25589680

Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Koulutuksen tutkimuslaitos - KTL [713]

Related items

Showing items with similar title or keywords.

  • Bridging the gap between research and practice : using phenomenographic findings to develop training for career practitioners 

    Kettunen, Jaana; Tynjälä, Päivi (Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2022)
  • Reliability and Validity Study of the Finnish Adaptation of Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire Version SRS-30 

    Kyrölä, Kati; Järvenpää, Salme; Ylinen, Jari; Mecklin, Jukka-Pekka; Repo, Jussi Petteri; Häkkinen, Arja (Lippincott Co., 2017)
    Study Design. A prospective clinical study to test and adapt a Finnish version of the Scoliosis Research Society 30 (SRS-30) questionnaire. Objective. To perform cross-cultural adaptation and evaluate the validity of the ...
  • AI Ethics : An Empirical Study on the Views of Practitioners and Lawmakers 

    Khan Arif, Ali; Akbar, Muhammad Azeem; Fahmideh, Mahdi; Liang, Peng; Waseem, Muhammad; Ahmad, Aakash; Niazi, Mahmood; Abrahamsson, Pekka (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2023)
    Artificial intelligence (AI) solutions and technologies are being increasingly adopted in smart systems contexts; however, such technologies are concerned with ethical uncertainties. Various guidelines, principles, and ...
  • Reliability and validity of the Finnish version of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, patient self-report section 

    Piitulainen, Kirsi; Paloneva, Juha; Ylinen, Jari; Kautiainen, Hannu; Häkkinen, Arja (BioMed Central Ltd., 2014)
    Abstract. Background: The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) is one of the most widely used shoulder outcome tools in clinical work and in scientific studies. However, it ...
  • Reliability and Validity of Family Affluence Scale (FAS II) among Adolescents in Beijing, China 

    Liu, Yang; Wang, Mei; Villberg, Jari; Torsheim, Torbjorn; Tynjälä, Jorma; Lv, Yan; Kannas, Lasse (Springer Netherlands, 2012)
    This study comprises two sub-studies. Study I assessed the test-retest reliability of Family Affluence Scale (FAS II) items among 95 students aged 11 and 15 years old in Beijing. Study II investigated the completion rate ...
  • Browse materials
  • Browse materials
  • Articles
  • Conferences and seminars
  • Electronic books
  • Historical maps
  • Journals
  • Tunes and musical notes
  • Photographs
  • Presentations and posters
  • Publication series
  • Research reports
  • Research data
  • Study materials
  • Theses

Browse

All of JYXCollection listBy Issue DateAuthorsSubjectsPublished inDepartmentDiscipline

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics
  • How to publish in JYX?
  • Self-archiving
  • Publish Your Thesis Online
  • Publishing Your Dissertation
  • Publication services

Open Science at the JYU
 
Data Protection Description

Accessibility Statement

Unless otherwise specified, publicly available JYX metadata (excluding abstracts) may be freely reused under the CC0 waiver.
Open Science Centre