Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRantala, Salla
dc.contributor.authorKontinen, Tiina
dc.contributor.authorKorhonen-Kurki, Kaisa
dc.contributor.authorMustalahti, Irmeli
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-14T08:01:03Z
dc.date.available2015-07-14T08:01:03Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationRantala, S., Kontinen, T., Korhonen-Kurki, K., & Mustalahti, I. (2015). Equity in REDD+: Varying logics in Tanzania. <i>Environmental Policy and Governance</i>, <i>25</i>(3), 201-212. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1669" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1669</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_24601131
dc.identifier.otherTUTKAID_65528
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/46502
dc.description.abstractEquity is frequently cited as one of the key design aspects of environmental governance regimes. In the context of Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+), a forest-based climate change mitigation instrument, the manner in which ‘equity’ is understood will be of critical importance for the impacts and acceptance of REDD+ policies and initiatives. Whereas the concept has been extensively studied in the academic literature, references to equity in REDD+ policy debates and documents are often vague, leaving room for various interpretations and modes of implementation. In our case study of the Tanzanian national REDD+ policy domain, we provide a conceptual framework based on an institutional logics approach for analysing the various underlying rationales in the ‘equity in REDD+’ debate. We apply it to demonstrate how the involved policy actors draw from heterogeneous equity logics in their support for and opposition to different governance models, highlighting the importance of precise contextualization and operationalization of broad international principles in national REDD+ initiatives.fi
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd.; E R P Environment
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEnvironmental Policy and Governance
dc.subject.otherREDD+
dc.subject.otherequity
dc.subject.otherinstitutional logics
dc.subject.otherpolicy
dc.subject.otherTanzania
dc.titleEquity in REDD+: Varying logics in Tanzania
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-201506302476
dc.contributor.laitosYhteiskuntatieteiden ja filosofian laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosDepartment of Social Sciences and Philosophyen
dc.contributor.oppiaineKansainvälinen kehitystutkimusfi
dc.contributor.oppiaineInternational Development Studiesen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.date.updated2015-06-30T12:15:02Z
dc.type.coarjournal article
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.format.pagerange201-212
dc.relation.issn1756-932X
dc.relation.numberinseries3
dc.relation.volume25
dc.type.versionsubmittedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment. This is a pre-print version of an article whose final and definitive form has been published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment. Published in this repository with the kind permission of the publisher.
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.relation.doi10.1002/eet.1669


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record