dc.contributor.author | Rantala, Salla | |
dc.contributor.author | Kontinen, Tiina | |
dc.contributor.author | Korhonen-Kurki, Kaisa | |
dc.contributor.author | Mustalahti, Irmeli | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-07-14T08:01:03Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-07-14T08:01:03Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Rantala, S., Kontinen, T., Korhonen-Kurki, K., & Mustalahti, I. (2015). Equity in REDD+: Varying logics in Tanzania. <i>Environmental Policy and Governance</i>, <i>25</i>(3), 201-212. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1669" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1669</a> | |
dc.identifier.other | CONVID_24601131 | |
dc.identifier.other | TUTKAID_65528 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/46502 | |
dc.description.abstract | Equity is frequently cited as one of the key design aspects of environmental governance
regimes. In the context of Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Forest
Degradation (REDD+), a forest-based climate change mitigation instrument, the manner
in which ‘equity’ is understood will be of critical importance for the impacts and
acceptance of REDD+ policies and initiatives. Whereas the concept has been
extensively studied in the academic literature, references to equity in REDD+ policy
debates and documents are often vague, leaving room for various interpretations and
modes of implementation. In our case study of the Tanzanian national REDD+ policy
domain, we provide a conceptual framework based on an institutional logics approach
for analysing the various underlying rationales in the ‘equity in REDD+’ debate. We
apply it to demonstrate how the involved policy actors draw from heterogeneous equity
logics in their support for and opposition to different governance models, highlighting the
importance of precise contextualization and operationalization of broad international
principles in national REDD+ initiatives. | fi |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; E R P Environment | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Environmental Policy and Governance | |
dc.subject.other | REDD+ | |
dc.subject.other | equity | |
dc.subject.other | institutional logics | |
dc.subject.other | policy | |
dc.subject.other | Tanzania | |
dc.title | Equity in REDD+: Varying logics in Tanzania | |
dc.type | article | |
dc.identifier.urn | URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201506302476 | |
dc.contributor.laitos | Yhteiskuntatieteiden ja filosofian laitos | fi |
dc.contributor.laitos | Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy | en |
dc.contributor.oppiaine | Kansainvälinen kehitystutkimus | fi |
dc.contributor.oppiaine | International Development Studies | en |
dc.type.uri | http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle | |
dc.date.updated | 2015-06-30T12:15:02Z | |
dc.type.coar | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 | |
dc.description.reviewstatus | peerReviewed | |
dc.format.pagerange | 201-212 | |
dc.relation.issn | 1756-932X | |
dc.relation.numberinseries | 3 | |
dc.relation.volume | 25 | |
dc.type.version | submittedVersion | |
dc.rights.copyright | © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment. This is a pre-print version of an article whose final and definitive form has been published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment. Published in this repository with the kind permission of the publisher. | |
dc.rights.accesslevel | openAccess | fi |
dc.relation.doi | 10.1002/eet.1669 | |
dc.type.okm | A1 | |