Survey of methods to visualize alternatives in multiple criteria decision making problems
Abstract
When solving decision problems where multiple conflicting criteria are to
be considered simultaneously, decision makers must compare several different alternatives
and select the most preferred one. The task of comparing multidimensional vectors
is very demanding for the decision maker without any support. Different graphical
visualization tools can be used to support and help the decision maker in understanding
similarities and differences between the alternatives and graphical illustration is a very
important part of decision support systems that are used in solving multiple criteria
decision making problems. The visualization task is by no means trivial because, on
the one hand, the graphics must be easy to comprehend and not too much information
should be lost but, on the other hand, no extra unintentional information should be
included. In this paper, we survey and analyze different ways of visualizing a small set
of discrete alternatives graphically in the context of multiple criteria decision making.
Some of the ways discussed are widely used and some others deserve to be brought
into a wider awareness. This survey provides a starting point for all those who deal
with multiple criteria decision making problems and need information of what kind
of visualization techniques could be put to use in order to support the decision maker
better.
Main Author
Format
Articles
Research article
Published
2014
Series
Subjects
Publication in research information system
Publisher
Springer
The permanent address of the publication
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201412023417Use this for linking
Review status
Peer reviewed
ISSN
0171-6468
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-012-0297-0
Language
English
Published in
OR Spectrum
Citation
- Miettinen, K. (2014). Survey of methods to visualize alternatives in multiple criteria decision making problems. OR Spectrum, 36(1), 3-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-012-0297-0
Copyright© Springer-Verlag 2012. This is a final draft version of the article whose final and definitive form has been published by Springer-Verlag.