Ricoeur's surprising take on recognition

Abstract
This essay examines Paul Ricœur’s views on recognition in his book The Course of Recognition. It highlights those aspects that are in some sense surprising, in relation to his previous publications and the general debates on Hegelian Anerkennung and the politics of recognition. After an overview of Ricœur’s book, the paper examines the meaning of “recognition” in Ricœur’s own proposal, in the dictionaries Ricœur uses, and in the contemporary debates. Then it takes a closer look at the ideas of recognition as identification and as “taking as true.” Then it turns to recognition (attestation) of oneself, in light of the distinction between human constants (and the question “What am I?”), and human variables (and the question “Who Am I?”). The last section concerns the dialectics of struggles for recognition and states of peace, and the internal relationship between the contents of a normative demand and what counts as satisfying the demand.
Main Author
Format
Articles Journal article
Published
2011
Series
Subjects
Publisher
University of Pittsburgh
Original source
http://ricoeur.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/ricoeur/index
The permanent address of the publication
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201202081141Käytä tätä linkitykseen.
Review status
Peer reviewed
ISSN
2156-7808
DOI
https://doi.org/doi:10.5195/errs.2011.57
Language
English
Published in
Etudes Ricoeuriennes/Ricoeur Studies Journal
Citation
  • Laitinen, A. (2011). Ricoeur's surprising take on recognition. Etudes Ricoeuriennes/Ricoeur Studies Journal, 2 (1), 35-50. doi:10.5195/errs.2011.57
License
CC BY-NC-ND 3.0Open Access
Copyright© Laitinen, 2011.

Share