Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

dc.contributor.authorAlanen, Aki-Matti
dc.contributor.authorSuomalainen, Ville
dc.date.accessioned2011-06-14T11:42:03Z
dc.date.available2011-06-14T11:42:03Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.otheroai:jykdok.linneanet.fi:1163131
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/27175
dc.description.abstractOveruse injuries are common among top athletes and people who exercise regularly. Conservative, non-pharmacological methods are used widely to treat overuse injuries and there is a large body of literature, including multiple systematic reviews, evaluating different terms of treatment. This literature needs summarizing and critiquing. Objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of different methods of conservative treatment on overuse injuries and to provide an analysis of systematic reviews. Published systematic reviews were identified by searching Medline, PEDro, Cochrane and Sportdiscus databases from the year 1996 to July 2010. Reference lists of identified studies were also hand searched. The assessment of quality of the reviews was performed by two individual reviewers according to a specifically designed scale for systematic reviews (Assendelft et al 1995) and only high quality reviews were included into analysis. 47 good or high quality systematic reviews or meta-anayses were included after final assessment. Based on the 47 good or high quality reviews included, no firm conclusions can be drawn on the effectiveness of conservative treatments. There is limited evidence for taping when combined with other modalities and for exercise therapy. There is also limited evidence that physical modalities are not effective with the exception for ESWT. For other interventions evidence is inconclusive because of reporting faults and heterogeneity of studies. There seems to be limited evidence in favor of exercise therapy and taping combined with other interventions in the management of overuse injuries. There is dearth of good quality evidence for the management of overuse injuries. Well conducted RCT’s are in need and developing new clinical assessment tools for diagnosing overuse injuries should be considered.
dc.format.extent87 sivua
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsThis publication is copyrighted. You may download, display and print it for Your own personal use. Commercial use is prohibited.en
dc.rightsJulkaisu on tekijänoikeussäännösten alainen. Teosta voi lukea ja tulostaa henkilökohtaista käyttöä varten. Käyttö kaupallisiin tarkoituksiin on kielletty.fi
dc.subject.otheroveruse injury
dc.subject.otherstress injury and cumulative trauma disorder
dc.subject.otherstress fracture
dc.subject.otherperiostitis
dc.subject.otherpatellofemoral syndrome(PFPS)
dc.subject.othersynovitis
dc.subject.othercapsulitis
dc.subject.otherchronic compartment syndrome
dc.subject.othertendinosis
dc.subject.othertendinopathy
dc.subject.othertendinitis
dc.titleEvidence of conservative treatment for overuse injuries analysis of systematic reviews
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-2011061411009
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten
dc.type.ontasotPro gradu -tutkielmafi
dc.type.ontasotMaster’s thesisen
dc.contributor.tiedekuntaLiikuntatieteellinen tiedekuntafi
dc.contributor.tiedekuntaFaculty of Sport and Health Sciencesen
dc.contributor.laitosTerveystieteiden laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosDepartment of Health Sciencesen
dc.contributor.yliopistoUniversity of Jyväskyläen
dc.contributor.yliopistoJyväskylän yliopistofi
dc.contributor.oppiaineFysioterapiafi
dc.contributor.oppiainePhysiotherapyen
jyx.includeIn.OAItrue
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.type.publicationmasterThesis
dc.contributor.oppiainekoodi50422
dc.subject.ysorasitusvammat
dc.subject.ysohoitomenetelmät
dc.subject.ysofysioterapia
dc.subject.ysoteippaus
dc.format.contentfulltext
dc.type.okmG2


Aineistoon kuuluvat tiedostot

Thumbnail

Aineisto kuuluu seuraaviin kokoelmiin

Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot