A comparison of joint species distribution models for percent cover data

Abstract
Joint species distribution models (JSDMs) have gained considerable traction among ecologists over the past decade, due to their capacity to answer a wide range of questions at both the species- and the community-level. The family of generalised linear latent variable models in particular has proven popular for building JSDMs, being able to handle many response types including presence-absence data, biomass, overdispersed and/or zero-inflated counts. We extend latent variable models to handle percent cover response variables, with vegetation, sessile invertebrate and macroalgal cover data representing the prime examples of such data arising in community ecology. Sparsity is a commonly encountered challenge with percent cover data. Responses are typically recorded as percentages covered per plot, though some species may be completely absent or present, that is, have 0% or 100% cover, respectively, rendering the use of beta distribution inadequate. We propose two JSDMs suitable for percent cover data, namely a hurdle beta model and an ordered beta model. We compare the two proposed approaches to a beta distribution for shifted responses, transformed presence-absence data and an ordinal model for percent cover classes. Results demonstrate the hurdle beta JSDM was generally the most accurate at retrieving the latent variables and predicting ecological percent cover data.
Main Authors
Format
Articles Research article
Published
2024
Series
Subjects
Publication in research information system
Publisher
Wiley
The permanent address of the publication
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202410296668Käytä tätä linkitykseen.
Review status
Peer reviewed
ISSN
2041-210X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.14437
Language
English
Published in
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Citation
  • Korhonen, P., Hui, F. K. C., Niku, J., Taskinen, S., & van der Veen, B. (2024). A comparison of joint species distribution models for percent cover data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, Early online. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.14437
License
CC BY 4.0Open Access
Additional information about funding
PK was funded by the Wihuri Foundation (00220161), and PK, JN and ST were funded by the Kone Foundation (201903741). ST was funded by the Research Council of Finland (453691) and the HiTEc COST Action (CA21163). FKCH was funded by an Australian Research Council Discovery Project (DP230101908).
Copyright© 2024 The Author(s). Methods in Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society

Share