Presentation cancelled by author
Practical application of disturbance based management in the forest company SCA in the northern part of Sweden.
(Oral)
Anna Cabrajic
SEE PEER REVIEW
The forest owned by SCA is situated in the northern part of Sweden within the boreal zone. This session will describe how natural disturbance is emulated within practical forest management today and also present a historical overview of the development during the last three decades.
The focus is on how the ASIO-model has been applied within SCA, a model that is based on different levels of natural fire disturbance intensities. The soil moisture and vegetation types typically vary largely on a small scale within northern part of Sweden. Hence, the natural forest fire disturbance intensity varies largely from “extremely rare” on wet sites typically dominated by Picea abies, to “often” on dry sites, which typically is dominated by pine, Pinus sylvestris. The presentation will describe how this model has been applied in practical forest management depending on soil moisture and forest type. Parts of the ASIO-model referring to wet and dry sites has had large importance not only within retention forestry but more so in managing stands for maintaining or increasing biodiversity with high conservation values, for instance the set-aside areas.
INTRO: The abstract describes a case study of the ASIO model for one company in northern Sweden on a alndscape that has high variability in disturbance regime at relatvely fine slatial scales.
MERITS: The abstract brings a case study that contrasts with other case studies of natural disturbance emulation from the region. It does a good job of distilling the important ideas into a short narrative.
CRITIQUE: I do not find and important weaknesses.
DISCUSSION: Perhaps this case study will show that natural disturbance emulation can work in northern Scandinavia, even though it seems to rare in the region. The topic is important to forest management and to ecologists.
- - -
INTRO: The abstract addresses a topic of high importance; that is, how to combine forestry and biodiversity conservation.
MERITS: Abstract is well written and logical.
CRITIQUE: No critique.
DISCUSSION: No suggestion on how to improve the abstract. The topic is of interest to both forest managers and researcher community.