Is the Eurasian Three-toed Woodpecker Picoides tridactylus a keystone species in boreal forest environments?
(Oral)
Timo Pakkala
, Philippe Fayt
, Jari Kouki
SEE PEER REVIEW
The Eurasian Three-toed Woodpecker Picoides tridactylus is a widespread species of the northern Palearctic forests. The species prefers mature coniferous and mixed forests, favouring forests with a good proportion of dead and dying trees. Three-toed Woodpecker has a close connection to forest habitats with natural dynamics and disturbances; it inhabits areas recently disturbed by fire, wind, snow, or other agents that increase the amount of suitable substrate of its insect prey. Its diet consists predominantly of spruce bark beetles (Coleoptera, Scolytidae), although phloem sap of conifer trees is also used especially in springtime.
We present here results of both published and unpublished studies that are based on long-term population studies in boreal areas in southern and eastern Finland.
The territory sites of Three-toed Woodpecker are detected to locate in structurally complex forests, and there is a strong positive correlation with the occupancy proportion of its territories and the quality of the forest landscape. The species is observed to indicate general species richness of forest birds and structural diversity of forest environment. Its breeding density increases along the conservation value of forest landscapes for breeding birds. The Three-toed Woodpecker is also considered a candidate of umbrella species for the bark beetle biodiversity given its requirement for ample dead wood and thereby susceptibility to forest management.
The Three-toed Woodpecker is a primary cavity excavator, and its old nest cavities are used by various cavity-nesting bird species in its territories. The species frequently reuses its own cavities, but they have found to be very important for the Pygmy Owl Glaucidium passerinum. However, the general importance of the Three-toed Woodpecker as a cavity-producer in boreal forests is most probably much smaller than that of the Great-spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos major.
Available evidence suggest that the Three-toed Woodpecker may regulate tree-damaging bark beetle populations during an epidemic. This underlines the benefit of protecting the species and its habitats as a means to possibly limit beetle damages in surrounding managed forests.
Based on the results and current knowledge, we evaluate the keystone species status and possible economic values of the Three-toed Woodpecker in boreal forest environments.
1. Fayt, P., Machmer, M. M. & Steeger, C. 2005: Regulation of spruce bark beetles by woodpeckers - a literature review. --- Forest Ecology and Management 206: 1--14.
2. Pakkala, T., Hanski, I. & Tomppo, E. 2002: Spatial ecology of the three-toed woodpecker in managed forest landscapes. --- Silva Fennica 36: 279--288.
3. Pakkala, T., Lindén, A., Tiainen, J., Tomppo, E. & Kouki, J. 2014: Indicators of forest biodiversity: which bird species predict high breeding bird assemblage diversity in boreal forests at multiple spatial scales? --- Annales Zoologici Fennici 51: 457--476.
INTRO: The abstract is nicely written and gives a clear overview of the possible keystone properties of three-toed woodpeckers. The three-toed woodpecker is in general an important species within conservation biology and therefore it is necessary to have a thorough understanding how the species function in an ecosystem. I think that this study contribute significantly to this.
MERITS: Nicely and cleary written, gives a good overview of current knowledge. It covers a wide range of important topics.
CRITIQUE: I see the importance of the abstract but this is not highlighted. Why is this important to know? I also miss a clear question, results and conclusion.
DISCUSSION: Points for improvement:
- Highlight the importance of this study
- Include a conclusion answering the question from the title.
- The second and last paragraph are redundant
- - -
INTRO: This abstract presents a summary of available studies (both published and unpublished) of the Eurasian Three-toed Woodpecker and its viability as a keystone/umbrella species.
MERITS: It is always nice to see synthesis of available data on a topic/species and provide insight on the full body of work rather than the individual studies.
CRITIQUE: In the third paragraph is a bit confusing and needs clarification in several areas. The authors use the phrase "strong positive correlation" without providing statistical values to back it up and this sentence is also unclear as to what two things are actually correlated with one another - suggest using "between" rather than "with" to clarify. They also use the phrase "the quality of the forest landscape" without qualifying what this mean. They also use the phrase "the species is observed to indicate general species richness..." when they mean is correlated with? Lastly, at the end of the paragraph, the authors state "requirement for dead wood and thereby susceptibility to forest management" and it is not clear if they are implying that forest management removes or creates dead wood.
It is also not clear why the Great-spotted Woodpecker is more important than the Three-toed - suggest adding a clause to clarify.
Citations are not shown in text. Because this is a summary of previous work, this is very important.
DISCUSSION: In general, I recommend including citations where appropriate, clarifying some vague statements and qualifying statements with data or more information when needed.
- - -
INTRO: This presentation aims to present results investigating the possible keystone properties of the European Three-toed Woodpecker.
MERITS: This presentation reports interesting information on the usefulness of the European Three-toed Woodpecker as keystone species in northern Palearctic forests.
CRITIQUE: Generally, this abstract is relevant, but I would have liked to have more details on the methodology, and specific results as most of the abstract hold on outcomes of the study.
DISCUSSION: As stated previously, adding more details on the methodology, and specific results may help to appreciate study's conclusions.